Check your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 6 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itPunch your phone number in the box below
I’II send an OTP on it.
I won’t confide your phone with anyone.
My Dear ,
Please write your reason against the objection raised in the box below.
I appreciate your effort.
May I request you to select one of the reasons for purging from below.
Disrespectful or rude towards a person or a group.
Promotes an undisclosed link or product or service.
Not seeking genuine answers .
Vulgar, Obscene, abusive etc..
Not a post on law or business.
Copied from other website or source and pasted here.
Has bad format, grammar, spelling so requires moderatation.
Thank you,
Yours sincerely,
Aaradhika, Thakurani's bestie
Do you think that the tax news in simple language are better? Can you write them in simple language? and then broadcast? Then Write them at shocks n mocks.
This case involves a writ petition filed by an assessee challenging the income tax department's decision to reopen their assessment for the financial year 2017-18. The court found that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not properly consider the assesse…
Login to write your newsThis case involves a petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) seeking to quash the condition imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat, while granting bail to the petitioner. The condition required the petitione…
Login to write your newsThe case involves a Chartered Accountant (CA) who was arrested for allegedly facilitating fraudulent GST refunds by uploading fake certificates. The High Court granted him regular bail after considering that the investigation is complete, the charge…
Login to write your newsThe petitioner, a director of a company accused of fraudulently availing Rs 72 crore input tax credit, approached the High Court seeking anticipatory bail. The court granted anticipatory bail with stringent conditions, considering the economic offen…
Login to write your newsThis case involves a businessman, the designated partner of Utkarsh Ispat LLP, who was arrested for allegedly availing illegal input tax credit of Rs. 31.02 crores by showing fake purchases from fictitious entities. The court granted him regular bai…
Login to write your newsThe Allahabad High Court granted bail to Subodh Kumar Garg, a proprietor accused of availing wrongful input tax credit (ITC) worth Rs. 8.76 crores under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017. The court found merit in Garg's arguments a…
Login to write your newsThe case involves an alleged money laundering case registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against the IREO Group of companies. Basant Bansal, the promoter of the M3M Group, approached the Delhi High Court seeking anticipatory bail, apprehend…
Login to write your newsThe court examined whether the Assessing Officer was competent to pass a draft assessment order under Section 144C(1) of the Income Tax Act against the petitioner company. The petitioner argued that it did not fall under the definition of an “eligib…
Login to write your newsThe case involves the assessee’s appeal challenging the correctness of the Dispute Resolution Panel’s (DRP) order dated 26.07.2018 in the matter of assessment under section 144(C)(1) r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961 for the assessment year 2…
Login to write your newsThe case involves two accused, Vakil Chand and Sunil Kumar, who were arrested in December 2020 for allegedly evading GST and fraudulently availing input tax credit (ITC) worth Rs. 9.6 crores. The court granted them regular bail after considering tha…
Login to write your newsThe Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime has introduced a complex set of rules and procedures for claiming refunds across various categories. This comprehensive guide delves into the nuances of refund computation, eligibility criteria, and the intric…
Login to write your newsThe High Court of Delhi, in the case of W.P.(C) 1262/2024 - KOXAN INDIA vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF GST & ANR., addressed the retrospective cancellation of GST registration. The petitioner challenged the order dated 24.03.2021, which cancelled their …
Login to write your newsIn this case, the petitioner challenged the order cancelling their GST registration retrospectively from 28.05.2022. The court found that the show cause notice and cancellation order lacked details and reasons for the retrospective cancellation. Consequently, the court set aside the cancellation order and restored the petitioner's GST registration, directing them to file necessary returns and comply with the rules. However, the tax authorities were…
This case involves a dispute over the retrospective cancellation of a petitioner's GST registration by the tax authorities. The petitioner challenged the cancellation order and the show cause notice, arguing that the reasons for retrospective cancellation were not provided. The court found the cancellation order and show cause notice lacking in details and modified the order to allow cancellation from the date the petitioner closed their business.
The petitioner challenged the order cancelling their GST registration retrospectively from January 2022 and the show cause notice leading to the cancellation. The court found that neither the show cause notice nor the cancellation order provided cogent reasons for the retrospective cancellation, and the petitioner was not given an opportunity to object to the same. Consequently, the court set aside the cancellation order and show cause notice, rest…
This case involves a dispute over the retrospective cancellation of a taxpayer's GST registration by the tax authorities. The petitioner challenged the order canceling their GST registration retrospectively from July 2017, despite receiving a show cause notice in November 2020. The court found issues with the retrospective cancellation and the lack of reasons provided in the show cause notice and cancellation order. The court modified the order to …
The petitioner, engaged in the trading of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, challenged the order dated 29.02.2024 that cancelled its GST registration retrospectively from 05.05.2018 and the show cause notice dated 05.01.2024 issued by the GST authorities. The court found the show cause notice and the order lacking in details and reasoning for the retrospective cancellation and set them aside, restoring the petitioner's GST registration.
This case involves a dispute over the retrospective cancellation of a proprietorship firm's GST registration by the tax authorities. The firm challenged the cancellation order, arguing that it lacked proper reasoning and denied them an opportunity to object. The court found issues with the cancellation process and modified the order to cancel the registration from the notice date instead of a retrospective date.
Goods & Services Tax,Apr. 10, 2024The petitioner, a private limited company, challenged the order dated 19.04.2021 that cancelled its GST registration retrospectively from 01.07.2017 and the show cause notice dated 11.02.2021 issued by the GST authorities. The court found the show cause notice and the order lacking in reasoning and set them aside, restoring the petitioner's GST registration.
This case involves a dispute over the retrospective cancellation of a petitioner's GST registration by the authorities. The petitioner challenged the cancellation order dated 15.12.2022, which retrospectively cancelled the registration from 01.07.2017, and the show cause notice dated 02.12.2021. The court found the show cause notice and cancellation order lacking in details and reasons for retrospective cancellation. Considering the petitioner's in…
This case involves a dispute between a proprietor (petitioner) and the GST authorities (respondent) over the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. The petitioner sought to cancel the registration from a specific date, but the authorities retrospectively cancelled it from an earlier date, alleging wrongful input tax credit claims. The court modified the cancellation order, allowing it to take effect from the date the petitioner disconti…
The petitioner, a trading firm, challenged the orders cancelling its GST registration retrospectively from July 2017 and dismissing its appeal for restoration. The court found issues with the orders and modified the cancellation date to the date requested by the petitioner, while allowing the tax authorities to recover dues.
Goods & Services Tax,Apr. 10, 2024Check your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 6 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itCheck your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 6 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itCheck your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 5 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itThanks, for confirming your phone number.
You can change it in your profile.Are you a tax professional?
If yes, then you can earn
money through me.
download the mobile app
You have successfully created your diary. You can access it from 'Store/Your Stuff' section.
OK