Shocksnmocks image
News Topics
Thakurani
A9 Top Floor C Block Community Center, Naraina Vihar
New Delhi, Delhi 110028
Facebook
Twitter
Google+

View and comment on the tax updates on a single page

Do you think that the tax news in simple language are better? Can you write them in simple language? and then broadcast? Then Write them at shocks n mocks.

Shocksnmocks image
  • Sub-contractor not liable for service tax if main contractor paid tax on full c…

    Customs & Excise,Mar. 15, 2024

    The case involved an appellant who provided services as a sub-contractor to main contractors during 2008-2012. The appellant did not pay service tax, believing the main contractors had discharged the tax liability on the full contract value. The court ruled that the extended period demand for service tax on the appellant cannot be sustained due to ambiguity in the law during that period.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Tax appeals dismissed for delay despite COVID-19 extension by Supreme Court.

    Goods & Services Tax,Mar. 15, 2024

    The case involves two writ petitions filed by a petitioner challenging the dismissal of their appeals against tax adjudication orders by the appellate authority on the grounds of delay. The appeals were filed under Section 107(1) of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, against adjudication orders dated 03.06.2020. The appellate authority rejected the appeals as being filed beyond the stipulated period under Section 107(4) of the Act,…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Court remands case back to Commissioner for decision on merits after finding de…

    Customs & Excise,Mar. 15, 2024

    This case involves an appeal filed by the appellant against an order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) rejecting their appeal on the grounds of limitation. The Commissioner had dismissed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The court found that the Commissioner erred in not condoning the delay and has remanded the matter back for a decision on merits.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Mar. 16, 2024

    When bonds reach maturity, companies must navigate a meticulous set of compliances to ensure a seamless redemption process. The Companies Act, 2013, and its accompanying rules, such as Rule 18(7) of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014, mandate the establishment of a Debenture Redemption Reserve (DRR) and specific investment requirements. Issuers must maintain transparency, provide timely intimations to trustees and stock exchan…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Mar. 16, 2024

    Companies issuing debentures must navigate the intricate provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and its accompanying rules. The Act mandates the creation of a Debenture Redemption Reserve (DRR) and a Debenture Redemption Investment (DRI) to protect debenture holders' interests. These measures ensure that companies set aside adequate funds for timely redemption, fostering investor confidence and promoting the growth of India's bond market. Exemption…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments

Court rules assessee entitled to interest on excess advance tax paid, even if i…

This case involves a dispute between an individual assessee and the Income Tax Officer (ITO) over the payment of interest on excess advance tax paid by the assessee. The ITO had refused to pay interest, citing that the advance tax instalments were not paid on the due dates specified in the Income Tax Act. The assessee challenged this decision in the High Court.

Income Tax,Mar. 08, 2024
0 Upvote|   0 Comments
  • Income Tax,Mar. 08, 2024

    The case involved Bakelite Hylam Ltd. disputing the Income Tax department's refusal to pay interest under Section 214 on excess advance tax paid during the financial year 1971-72, even though some instalments were paid after the due dates specified under Section 211. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Bakelite Hylam, overruling an earlier Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Income Tax,Mar. 08, 2024

    The case involves a dispute over the petitioner's claim for interest under Section 214 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on excess advance tax paid for the assessment year 1976-77. The petitioner submitted an estimate of income and a demand draft for the balance advance tax before the due date for the third installment. However, the demand draft was received by the department a day after the due date. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) and the Commissioner of…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
Income Tax,Jul. 22, 2020

This case involves a road contractor whose books of accounts were rejected by the Assessing Officer (AO) for the assessment years 2007-08 to 2010-11. The AO applied a gross profit rate of 5% (3.5% for one year) on the grounds that the contractor failed to maintain stock registers and provide supporting evidence like invoices, contracts, muster rolls, and vouchers. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and the Income Tax Appellate Tribun…

0 Upvote   | 1 Comments

Suzuki's non-compete payment to ex-MD ruled as capital receipt, not taxable inc…

The case revolves around the taxability of Rs. 1.32 crores paid by Suzuki Motorcycle India Pvt. Ltd. to its former Managing Director, Mr. Sheel, for not providing his expertise to any other two-wheeler company for two years. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the amount was a capital receipt and not taxable income. The Revenue Department challenged this decision in the High Court.

Income Tax,Jul. 25, 2020
0 Upvote|   1 Comments
Loading...
Ask a Question Create a Ripple(News)