Check your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 6 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itPunch your phone number in the box below
I’II send an OTP on it.
I won’t confide your phone with anyone.
My Dear ,
Please write your reason against the objection raised in the box below.
I appreciate your effort.
May I request you to select one of the reasons for purging from below.
Disrespectful or rude towards a person or a group.
Promotes an undisclosed link or product or service.
Not seeking genuine answers .
Vulgar, Obscene, abusive etc..
Not a post on law or business.
Copied from other website or source and pasted here.
Has bad format, grammar, spelling so requires moderatation.
Thank you,
Yours sincerely,
Aaradhika, Thakurani's bestie
Do you think that the tax news in simple language are better? Can you write them in simple language? and then broadcast? Then Write them at shocks n mocks.
This case involves an appeal against an order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow, dismissing the appellant's appeal as time-barred. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that the appeal was filed after more…
Login to write your newsThis case involves a writ petition challenging the dismissal of the petitioner's appeal under Section 107 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act) on the ground of limitation. The petitioner argued that Section 5 of the Limita…
Login to write your newsThis case deals with an appeal filed against an order of the Commissioner (Appeals) Customs, GST & Central Excise, Lucknow, dismissing the appellant's appeal as time-barred. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that the appeal was filed after the statuto…
Login to write your newsThe case involves two appeals filed by a partnership firm against orders passed by a Single Bench of the Calcutta High Court in two separate writ petitions (WPA 107 of 2021 and WPA 133 of 2021). The appeals concern the issue of whether the Appellate…
Login to write your newsThe petitioner challenged an order dismissing their application to condone the delay in filing a refund application for the assessment year 2011-12. The court upheld the dismissal, as the application was filed beyond the six-year time limit prescrib…
Login to write your newsThis case involves a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the imposition of service tax on their works by the respondent authority. The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner had failed to file an appeal against the original ord…
Login to write your newsThis case involves a company from Faridabad that was transporting goods to Tata Steel in Jamshedpur when its truck was intercepted by state tax authorities. The authorities alleged defective documents and cancelled the e-way bill, imposing tax and p…
Login to write your newsDebentures, a crucial financial instrument for companies seeking long-term borrowing, have a life cycle that culminates in redemption. This comprehensive guide delves into the nuances of debenture redemption as outlined in the Companies Act 2013 and…
Login to write your newsThis case involves an appeal by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], confirming the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed…
Login to write your newsThe appeals arose from the dismissal of writ petitions by a single judge, who had declined to entertain the appeals as they were filed beyond the maximum time limit stipulated under the statute, even after the condonable extent of delay. The appella…
Login to write your newsThe case involved an appeal against a Single Judge's order dismissing a writ petition challenging a GST assessment order for FY 2021-22. The court allowed the appeal, quashing the assessment order due to the revenue authority's failure to provide a …
Login to write your newsThis comprehensive guide delves into the intricate world of debenture trustees, shedding light on their pivotal role in safeguarding the interests of debenture holders. It explores the eligibility criteria, registration process, duties, and powers o…
Login to write your newsThe case involved an appellant who provided services as a sub-contractor to main contractors during 2008-2012. The appellant did not pay service tax, believing the main contractors had discharged the tax liability on the full contract value. The court ruled that the extended period demand for service tax on the appellant cannot be sustained due to ambiguity in the law during that period.
The case involves two writ petitions filed by a petitioner challenging the dismissal of their appeals against tax adjudication orders by the appellate authority on the grounds of delay. The appeals were filed under Section 107(1) of the Tripura State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, against adjudication orders dated 03.06.2020. The appellate authority rejected the appeals as being filed beyond the stipulated period under Section 107(4) of the Act,…
This case involves an appeal filed by the appellant against an order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) rejecting their appeal on the grounds of limitation. The Commissioner had dismissed the appellant's application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The court found that the Commissioner erred in not condoning the delay and has remanded the matter back for a decision on merits.
When bonds reach maturity, companies must navigate a meticulous set of compliances to ensure a seamless redemption process. The Companies Act, 2013, and its accompanying rules, such as Rule 18(7) of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014, mandate the establishment of a Debenture Redemption Reserve (DRR) and specific investment requirements. Issuers must maintain transparency, provide timely intimations to trustees and stock exchan…
Companies issuing debentures must navigate the intricate provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and its accompanying rules. The Act mandates the creation of a Debenture Redemption Reserve (DRR) and a Debenture Redemption Investment (DRI) to protect debenture holders' interests. These measures ensure that companies set aside adequate funds for timely redemption, fostering investor confidence and promoting the growth of India's bond market. Exemption…
This case involves a dispute between an individual assessee and the Income Tax Officer (ITO) over the payment of interest on excess advance tax paid by the assessee. The ITO had refused to pay interest, citing that the advance tax instalments were not paid on the due dates specified in the Income Tax Act. The assessee challenged this decision in the High Court.
Income Tax,Mar. 08, 2024The case involved Bakelite Hylam Ltd. disputing the Income Tax department's refusal to pay interest under Section 214 on excess advance tax paid during the financial year 1971-72, even though some instalments were paid after the due dates specified under Section 211. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Bakelite Hylam, overruling an earlier Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment.
The case involves a dispute over the petitioner's claim for interest under Section 214 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on excess advance tax paid for the assessment year 1976-77. The petitioner submitted an estimate of income and a demand draft for the balance advance tax before the due date for the third installment. However, the demand draft was received by the department a day after the due date. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) and the Commissioner of…
This case involves a road contractor whose books of accounts were rejected by the Assessing Officer (AO) for the assessment years 2007-08 to 2010-11. The AO applied a gross profit rate of 5% (3.5% for one year) on the grounds that the contractor failed to maintain stock registers and provide supporting evidence like invoices, contracts, muster rolls, and vouchers. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and the Income Tax Appellate Tribun…
The case revolves around the taxability of Rs. 1.32 crores paid by Suzuki Motorcycle India Pvt. Ltd. to its former Managing Director, Mr. Sheel, for not providing his expertise to any other two-wheeler company for two years. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the amount was a capital receipt and not taxable income. The Revenue Department challenged this decision in the High Court.
Income Tax,Jul. 25, 2020Check your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 6 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itCheck your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 6 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itCheck your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 5 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itThanks, for confirming your phone number.
You can change it in your profile.Are you a tax professional?
If yes, then you can earn
money through me.
download the mobile app
You have successfully created your diary. You can access it from 'Store/Your Stuff' section.
OK