Shocksnmocks image
News Topics
Thakurani
A9 Top Floor C Block Community Center, Naraina Vihar
New Delhi, Delhi 110028
Facebook
Twitter
Google+

View and comment on the tax updates on a single page

Do you think that the tax news in simple language are better? Can you write them in simple language? and then broadcast? Then Write them at shocks n mocks.

Shocksnmocks image
  • Parties no longer stay at said address can't prove that purchases are bogus.

    Income Tax,Dec. 10, 2020

    The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench, in the case of Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Cir.14(1), New Delhi vs. M/s Padmini VNA Mechatronics Pvt. Ltd., dismissed the departmental appeals against the deletion of additions on account of bogus purchases for the assessment years 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09. The appeals were directed against the orders of the Ld. CIT (Appeals)-XXIV, New Delhi, dated 04.12.2013 for A.Y. 2006-07 and 2007-0…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • The ITAT held it was premature to levy penalty at this stage as CIT(A)'s second…

    Income Tax,May. 08, 2021

    The case involves M/s. Kottakkal Wood Complex appealing against the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2008-09. The appeals were filed against the consolidated order of the CIT(A) dated 30/09/2019. The case revolves around suppressed sales and undisclosed stock, with the High Court confirming the action of the Assessing Officer and providing relief to the assessee only regarding the quantification…

    0 Upvote   | 1 Comments
  • Its true that AO should corroborate section 133A oaths, but in section 69 (unex…

    Income Tax,Sep. 26, 2020

    The Kerala High Court clarified that the statement made on oath by an assessee during survey proceedings is not conclusive and can be explained or withdrawn by the assessee. Assessment of tax cannot be solely based on the sworn statement made by the assessee under Section 133A(3)(iii) of the Act. The burden of proving the source of a sum of money received by an assessee is on the assessee, and where an assessee fails to prove satisfactorily the sou…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Income Tax,Apr. 06, 2024

    In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeals filed by M/s Yashasvi Fish Meal and Oil Company, Udupi, against the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) towards bogus purchases for various assessment years. The ITAT held that the AO cannot make additions solely based on a retracted statement recorded during a survey, without corroborative evidence or rejecting the books of accounts.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Income Tax,Oct. 08, 2020

    The High Court has upheld the Tribunal's decision in a case involving M/s Sunshine Import and Export Private Limited, a company engaged in the manufacturing and trading of precious and semi-precious stones and jewelry. The case revolved around whether the Assessing Officer (AO) could reject the company's books of account and make additions to its income based solely on a statement from one of the directors recorded during a survey under Section 133…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments

Tax Authorities should Limit Additions to Gross Profit Rate in Bogus Purchase C…

The primary issue revolves around the addition of Rs. 1,25,62,972/- on account of alleged bogus purchases and commission, based on the findings of the Assessing Officer (AO) during the scrutiny assessment. After hearing both the parties, relying on the Jurisdictional High Court's decision, the Tribunal remitted the case back to the assessing officer with a direction to examine the profit percentage on the disputed transactions, the genuine purchase…

Income Tax,Apr. 06, 2024
0 Upvote|   0 Comments
  • Goods & Services Tax,Mar. 14, 2024

    In the case of Arvind Gupta vs. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, the petitioner's appeal was initially rejected due to a delay in submission. The petitioner, suffering from carcinoma maxilla, cited frequent medical treatments as the cause for delay. The court, referencing the judgment in the case of S.K. Chakraborty & Sons v. Union of India & Ors., held that the appellate authority has the power to condone delay beyond the limitation specified in…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Goods & Services Tax,Mar. 14, 2024

    The strict timeline for filing appeals under Section 107 of the GST Act has sparked debate, with High Courts offering contrasting viewpoints. Some judgments maintain that the Appellate Authority lacks the power to condone delays beyond the prescribed period, arguing that the GST Acts are self-contained codes that exclude the applicability of the general Limitation Act, 1963. However, a recent judgment by the Calcutta High Court held that Section 10…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
Goods & Services Tax,Mar. 14, 2024

The court ruled that the appellate authority under the GST Act has the power to condone the delay in filing an appeal beyond the statutory period of 90 days. This decision was based on the legal position laid down by the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court in S.K. Chakraborty & Sons v. Union of India & Ors. The court set aside the impugned order of the appellate authority, which had summarily rejected the petitioner’s appeal on the ground of …

0 Upvote   | 0 Comments

Court Rules Against Tax Authorities Blocking Electronic Credit Ledger with Nil …

The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, stating that the tax authorities exceeded their jurisdiction under Rule 86A by blocking the electronic credit ledger with a nil credit balance. The court emphasized the strict interpretation of taxing provisions and directed the respondents to withdraw the negative block on the petitioners’ ledger. The petitioners were also entitled to a refund of the Rs. 20 lakh deposited by them under protest to enable…

Goods & Services Tax,Apr. 13, 2024
0 Upvote|   0 Comments
Loading...
Ask a Question Create a Ripple(News)