Here is Portfolio page of Ankur, with all his work

Reduction claimed on computing book profits u/s 115JB, at 100 % allowed, SC.
Nov. 06, 2015
Asessee was MAT Co., while computing its book profits u/s 115JB, assessee claimed reduction under clause (iv) of Explanation to Sec. 115JB at 100 % of export profits. AO, allowed only 80% of export profits in terms of Sec. 80HHC(1B). On appeal CIT & Tribunal allowed 100%. On appeal HC held in favor of revenue. On appeal SC held, difference between eligibility & deductibility of profits can not be ascertained purely on basis of c…
Assessee directed to show records on which change in accounting policy made.
Nov. 23, 2015
Assessee filed return declaring loss. Assessment completed u/s 143(3) &Sec.115JB. AO reopened assessment on ground of no change in accounting policy regarding dep. AO made addit'n to book profit on account of applying reduced rate of dep. CIT(A) upheld it. On appeal ITAT held, issue on merits is set aside to record of AO for deciding afresh after verification & examination of relevant record, which assessee has not produced before AO & Tribunal.-00…
Sum paid by Co. to lessor was not revenue exp. made for working cap. asset, SC
Nov. 14, 2015
Assessee Co. acquired from State Govt. lease of limestone quarries for manufacture of cement. In a/c year Co. paid its lessor as per two covenants & claimed to deduct sum in computation of its business profits u/s 10(2)(xv). AAC, ITO & Tribunal rejected it. On reference HC upheld it. SC upheld it too holding that sum agreed to be paid by Co. to lessor was not revenue exp. which was made by Co. for working capital asset which it had acquired.-010366
Amounts held includible in total receipt u/s 44BB for levy of tax at 10% rate.
Dec. 10, 2015
Assessee NR Co. explored & produced in India. It declared its revenues on account of two contracts with 'X' Co. & offered its receipts to tax at rate 10% according to proviso. of Sec. 44BB. AO rejected it & included amounts in total receipt. In light of CIT v. Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. [2008] 300 ITR 265, CIT held, both amts. are includible in total receipt provided u/s 44BB for levy of tax at rate of 10%. ITAT upheld it on app…
AO held erroneous in invoking Sec. 43 for determining actual cost in deal.
Nov. 02, 2015
Assessee acquired business of EMD at slump price. AO found, assessee enhanced value of assets as WDV of assets shown & disallowed excess depreciation. On appeal, CIT(A) held, there was no question of evading tax liability by assessee even if lower depreciation was granted. On appeal, ITAT upheld order of CIT(A). On appeal, HC upheld CIT(A) & ITAT decision stating that assessee had no income for it to reduce its tax liabilities by way of transfer.-0…
Deduct'n calim u/s 80-IB(10) on housing project allowed to assessee, HC
Dec. 08, 2015
Assessee-HUF claimed deduct'n u/s 80-IB(10) on housing project. AO disallowed it. On appeal, CIT(A) allowed it holding that assessee need not own property to claim deduct'n u/s 80-IB(10) & car park area would not be held as private area. On appeal, Tribunal upheld it. On appeal HC upheld it too as in proviso. no justification in including car park in definit'n of built-up area of residential unit for purpose of determining maximum built-u…
As Internat'nl transact'ns consistent with ALP, thus no TP adjustments, ITAT
Dec. 11, 2015
Assessee, subsidiary of foreign Co. mfd. & traded fluid power hydraulic equipm't. It imported raw materials & exported finished goods. TPO held, separate benchmarking required to be undertaken for manufacturing as well as trading segment. Thus, an adjustment was computed by applying external TNMM. On appeal ITAT held, international transactions entered into were consistent with ALP & no transfer pricing adjustment was required to be mad…
As assessees had insufficient cause, thus delay in filling case was not condoned
Dec. 11, 2015
In search, documents, a/c books & papers seized from office of assessees. AO issued notice u/s 153A for block assessm't proceedings. AO passed assessm't order by making addit'ns. CIT(A) & ITAT upheld AO's order. On appeal HC found, assessees have not shown sufficient cause for condoning delay. Parameters laid down by SC in in Esha Bhattacharjee v. Managing Committee of Raghunathpur, Nafar Academy 2013 (5) CTC 547 delay held not to be condon…
Section 66, 67(o) Finance Act held ultra vires to contitution, SC
Apr. 08, 2016
On writ HC held, Sec. 66, 67(o) of Finance Act, 1994 & other provisions related to Kalyana Mandapams & Mandap-Keepers to be intra vires of Constitution of India. On writ SC held, it has been a well established judicial principle that so long as legislation is in substance, on matter assigned to legislature enacting that statute, it must be held valid in its entirety even though it may trench upon matters beyond its competence.
CIT(A) method to arrive at fair market value of plot, held better, ITAT
Dec. 24, 2015
Assessee-Co. sold its factory land. It reported fair market value (FMV) of land at Rs.14.12 cr. on basis of report of reg. valuer &, worked out capital gain. AO valued it 1.7 cr on basis of unused land. CIT(A) rejected assesse's valuation report & calulated FMV 2.78 cr. On appeal ITAT held, CIT(A) had adopted probable method for arriving at FMV of plot & that annual rate of appreciat'n method. His method held better than method adopted …