Here is Portfolio page of Rajeev, with all his work

Burden to prove concealment/undervaluation of income is on revenue, held HC.
Nov. 03, 2015
Assessees purchased properties. AO made additions on basis of valuation by DVO. On appeal ITAT held, AO could not tax amounts merely based upon DVO's report in absence of any material pointing to under valuation. On appeal HC upheld ITAT decision relying upon CIT v. Bajrang Lal Bansal[2011] 335 ITR 572/200: Only when burden to prove concealment of income is discharged by revenue, it would be permissible to rely upon valuation given by DVO.-000291
As tenancy belonged to individual partners, asseessee can't be taxed on rent.
Nov. 03, 2015
Assessee ran business of rental premises. AO after survey found an agreement indicating surrender of tenancy by assessee-firm in favour of builder. AO taxed rent. On appeal CIT(A) & ITAT deleted tax on ground that tenancy of rental premises belonged to individual partners & not to assessee. Also, it was tripartite agreement & rent was normal allowable business expenditure of Assessee's firm. On appeal HC upheld both CIT(A) & ITAT findings.-000286
Applicant held not liable to tax in India in view of DTAA between India & USA.
Nov. 02, 2015
Discounted margin described as income by way of interest within meaning of Sec. 2(28A) & Sec. 9(1)(v) by AO. On appeal AAR held, discounting of bill of exchange or promissory note being a purchase of instrument as it were & especially when it is discounted without recourse, it has to be held that applicant is not liable to tax in India in view of DTAA between India & USA. Applicant will not be subject to withholding of tax u/s 195 of I.T.Act.-010557
Assessee held entitled to deduct'n claim u/s 54 I.T.Act. as CBDT circular, ITAT
Dec. 11, 2015
Assessee in return showed amt. as long-term capital gain. It claimed deduct'n u/s 54D in respect of capital gain from sale of bungalow. AO held Sec. 54D applicable in case of compulsory acquisition of lands and buildings . Thus, rejected assessee's claim. CIT(A) allowed it on appeal as due to inadvertent typographical error wrong Sec. was mentioned. On appeal ITAT held, assessee entitled to deduct'n u/s 54 as per facts of case & CBDT circular.
DVO's report rightly corroborate statement made by assessee before I.T. Dept, HC
Dec. 24, 2015
AO was not satisfied, as purchase amt. did'nt reflect real value of investm't of assessee in property. AO referred it to DVO. On ground of income concealment AO levied penalty. CIT(A) & ITAT upheld it. On appeal HC held, Tribunal erred in holding that DVO's report did'nt corroborate statement made by assessee before income-tax authorities. ITAT right in accepting consideration as reflected in rgd. sale deed did not suffer from any legal infir...
Loss be deducted in computing profits u/s 10 I.T.Act as it is business loss,SC
Nov. 02, 2015
Appellant ran business as money lending, dealing in shares & bullion. Misappropriation of huge funds for satisfaction of personal debts was made by 'C', who held power of attorney. Suit filed for recovery before HC was allowed, part amount was recovered. Tribunal held, loss suffered was not trading loss. On appeal HC upheld it. On appeal SC set it aside holding, loss sustained to be deducted in computing profits u/s 10(1) as was business loss.-01...
Statute has authority to direct creat'n of special reserves apart from manage...
Nov. 25, 2015
Assessee is NBFC. It leased commercial infrastructure construct'n machinery etc. Assessee filed return declaring loss under normal proviso. & book profit. AO made adjustment which were treated by assessee as Debt Redempt'n Reserve. On Q. wh. reserve created u/s 45-IC of RBI Act, 1934, is liability or reserve? HC held, Generally reserves are created at discret'n of managem't, but in certain cases statute can direct creat'n of special reserves.
Loan to AE abroad, int. rate applicable is rate in country where loan consumed.
Dec. 08, 2015
Assessee mfd. plastic parts & rendered engineering services. It advanced certain amt. as loan to its subsidiary in Germany & charged no interest on it. TPO determined ALP on interest on loan advanced at 10.25%. AO passed assessm't order on it. AO challenged it before DRP. On apppeal ITAT held, loan advanced to AE situated abroad, interest rate to be applied is rate prevailing in country where loan has been consumed. HC upheld it on appeal.-000323
Singular act of oppression is enough to grant appropriate reliefs held CLB.
Nov. 04, 2015
Petition alleging oppression & mismanagement committed by 2nd & 3rd Respondent in affairs of first Respondent company. Held, shares were gifted by petitioner has not been proved by respondents. Therefore, depriving petitioner from his shares with mala fide motive & for no valid reason, amounts to grave act of oppression. It is continuous wrong & is still persisting. Thus, this singular act of oppression is enough to grant appropri...