The challenges faced by the AT1 bond market in India and the efforts being made by government authorities, financial market regulators, banks, and asset managers to revive this market. It highlights the debates surrounding the valuation and treatment of AT1 bonds, as well as the differing views of banks and mutual funds on the regulatory rules governing these complex securities.
The current state of the AT1 bond market in India and the efforts being made by the government, financial market regulators, banks, and asset managers to revive this market. AT1 bonds, also known as additional tier-1 bonds, are a type of quasi-equity instrument that banks issue to raise capital. These bonds are considered complex securities and have sparked debates and court battles. The article highlights the challenges faced by the AT1 bond market and the differing views of banks and mutual funds regarding the valuation and risk associated with these bonds.
The key points and issues discussed in the article:
1. AT1 Bonds and Valuation:
2. Differing Views:
3. Regulatory Issues:
4. Call for Change:
In summary, the article highlights the challenges and debates surrounding the valuation and treatment of AT1 bonds in India. It underscores the need for regulatory changes and a concerted effort to revive the market for these complex securities.
Q1: What are AT1 bonds?
A1: AT1 bonds, also known as additional tier-1 bonds, are a type of quasi-equity instrument that banks issue to raise capital. These perpetual bonds have a call option that allows the issuing bank to redeem the bonds at the end of five years or later.
Q2: What are the regulatory challenges facing the AT1 bond market?
A2: The Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has introduced new valuation regulations that require investing funds to treat AT1 bonds as securities with a 100-year maturity, leading to concerns among banks and mutual funds. This has sparked debates and differing views on the valuation and risk associated with these bonds.
Q3: Why is there a debate between banks and mutual funds regarding AT1 bonds?
A3: Banks believe that a change in the valuation technique, by lowering the bond tenor from 100 years to the year of the call option, would improve AT1 bond valuation in investors’ books and rekindle institutional demand. On the other hand, fund managers argue that investor interest would not be adequately restored as long as troubled banks can unilaterally write down the bonds without touching their equity.