Assessee Migration — Petitioner is a partnership firm under Kerala Value Added Tax Act which migrated to GST regime — For carrying forward accumulated credit it filed GST TRAN-01 — Despite several attempts it could not file application for transitional credit due to system error — Hence, present petition seeking directions for taking eligible credit — Held, relying on circular dated 03.04.2018 issued by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs which provides for setting up of an IT Grievance Redressal Cell for all technical glitches — Assessee was to follow due procedure and file an application before nodal officer who would then forward application to concerned officer of GSTN — Thereafter, issues faced would be recorded and appropriate orders would be passed — Additionally, Revenue was directed to enable taking credit during migration period of Petitioner — Petition Dismissed.
1. The petitioner, a partnership firm, registered under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, has now migrated to the Goods and Services Tax regime. To use the input tax available to its credit at the time of migration, the petitioner had to upload FORM GST TRAN-1 within the stipulated time. The petitioner asserts that though it attempted to upload the form within the time, it failed because of some system error. The petitioner, therefore, seeks directions for taking credit of the available input tax.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri N.Nagaresh, the learned Assistant Solicitor General and Dr.Thushara James, the learned Government Pleader, as well as Sri P.R.Sreejith, the learned Standing Counsel, besides perusing the record.
3. The Government of India issued a circular for “setting up an IT Grievance Redressal Mechanism to address the grievances of taxpayers due to technical glitches on GST Portal.” Paragraph 5 of the circular outlines the procedure the Nodal Officers is to follow. It reads:
5. Nodal officers and identification of issues
5.1 GSTN, Central and State government would appoint nodal officers in requisite number to address the problem a taxpayer faces due to glitches, if any, in the Common Portal. This would be publicized adequately.
5.2 Taxpayers shall make an application to the field officers or the nodal officers where there was a demonstrable glitch on the Common Portal in relation to an identified issue, due to which the due process as envisaged in law could not be completed on the Common Portal.
5.3 Such an application shall enclose evidences as may be needed for an identified issue to establish bona fide attempt on the part of the taxpayer to comply with the due process of law
5.4 These applications shall be collated by the nodal officer and forwarded to GSTN who would on receipt of application examine the same. GSTN shall after verifying its electronic records and the applications received, identify the issue involved where a large section of tax payers are affected. GSTN shall forward the same to the IT Grievance Redressal Committee with suggested solutions for resolution of the problem.
(italics supplied)
4. Not only the petitioner but also many other people faced this technical glitch and approached this Court. Both the learned counsel submit that this Court on earlier occasions permitted the petitioner to apply to the Nodal Officer concerned to have the issue resolved.
5. So, here too, the petitioner may apply to the Nodal Officer. The petitioner applying, the Nodal Officer will look into the issue and facilitate the petitioner’s uploading FORM GST TRAN-1, without reference to the time-frame. Ordered so.
6. I may also observe that if the petitioner applies within two weeks after receiving this judgment, the Nodal Officer will consider it and take steps within a week thereafter. If the uploading of FORM GST TRAN-1 is not possible for reasons not attributable to the petitioner, the authority will also enable it to take credit of the input tax available at the time of its migration. With these directions, I dispose of the Writ Petition.
Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
JUDGE