The court has condoned the delay in filing the restoration of an appeal in this case. After hearing the learned counsel representing the appellant, the application for restoration has been approved. Consequently, the appeal has been reinstated to the file. The decision was presided over by Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman, reflecting the court's commitment to procedural fairness even in the face of delays.

In this case, the court has granted condonation for the delay in filing the restoration application. The learned counsel representing the appellant was heard during the proceedings. The application for restoration has been allowed by the court, leading to the successful restoration of the appeal to the file. The decision was made by Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman and Indu Malhotra. This highlights the court's willingness to accommodate and consider procedural matters to ensure a fair hearing and resolution of the appeal.

Delay in filing the restoration is condoned.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Application for restoration is allowed.
Appeal is restored to the file.
(ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN)
(INDU MALHOTRA)
New Delhi;
October 01, 2018.
Delay in filing the restoration is condoned.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Application for restoration is allowed.
Appeal is restored to the file in terms of the signed order.
(R. NATARAJAN) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY)
COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER
(Signed order is placed on the file)