CIT(A) is directed to decide assessee’s appeal against fresh assessment made by the AO disallowing assessee’s claim for deduction under s. 80-IA uninfluenced by the earlier order passed by the CIT under s. 263 setting aside such claim of deduction allowed in the original assessment as well as the impugned order passed by the High Court.

CIT(A) is directed to decide assessee’s appeal against fresh assessment made by the AO disallowing assessee’s claim for deduction under s. 80-IA uninfluenced by the earlier order passed by the CIT under s. 263 setting aside such claim of deduction allowed in the original assessment as well as the impugned order passed by the High Court.

Income Tax

Assessee Deduction under s. 80-IA—Allowability—Order allowing deduction set aside by revisional order—Tribunal set aside the revisional order—On appeal by the Department, High Court set aside the order of the Tribunal—On a special leave petition by the assessee, the Supreme Court permitted the Department to proceed with fresh assessment without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties—Thereupon, AO has passed a fresh order disallowing the claim of deduction under s. 80-IA—Since the assessee has preferred an appeal to the CIT(A) against the fresh assessment,CIT(A) is directed to decide the matter uninfluenced by the order of the CIT under s. 263 as well as the impugned order passed by the High Court—Teknika Components (Judgment dt. 5th Jan., 2010 of the Himachal Pradesh High Court in IT Appeal No. 37 of 2006) set aside. (Para 7)

By consent, the matter is taken up for hearing.


Heard learned counsel on both sides.


Leave granted.


In the present case, the assessee had claimed deduction under Section 80IA (of Income Tax Act, 1961), [‘Act’, for short], which was allowed by the Assessing Officer. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax [‘CIT’ for short] passed an order under Section 263 (of Income Tax Act, 1961), the effect of which was to disallow deduction granted under Section 80IA (of Income Tax Act, 1961) by the Assessing Officer. Aggrieved by the order of CIT, the assessee preferred an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [‘Tribunal’, for short]. That appeal was allowed by the Tribunal. The High Court, in the appeal preferred by the Department, came to the conclusion that the Tribunal had not answered some of the issues, which stood decided by the CIT under Section 263 (of Income Tax Act, 1961). In the circumstances, the High Court set aside the order of the Tribunal.


We are of the view that, instead of High Court itself answering those issues, it ought to have remitted the case to the Tribunal which has not been done in the present case. Against the order of the High Court, the assessee approached this Court by way of special leave petition. On 5th January, 2011, this Court permitted the Department to proceed with re-assessment without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. We are informed that the Assessing Officer has re-assessed and passed a fresh order on 5th May, 2011. This time, he has disallowed the claim for deduction under Section 80IA (of Income Tax Act, 1961).


In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, since the assessee has preferred an appeal to CIT (Appeals) against the order of the Assessing Officer dated 5th May, 2011, we direct CIT (Appeals) to decide the matter uninfluenced by the earlier order of CIT under Section 263 (of Income Tax Act, 1961) as well as the impugned order passed by the High Court.


Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the civil appeal filed by the assessee stands disposed of.


Till the appeal is heard and disposed of by CIT (Appeals), the order passed by this Court on 5th January, 2011 will continue to operate.



[S.H. KAPADIA]


[K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN]


[SWATANTER KUMAR]


New Delhi,

September 23, 2011.