INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR. VS SOUTH YARRA HOLDINGS-(Supreme Court)

Joydip Roy, Gargi Khanna, Satyalipsu Roy, Advs., Anil Katiyar, AOR for the Petitioner.

Delay condoned.

The tax effect in the present matter being less than two crores, in view of the CBDT Circular dated 8.8.2019, we see no reason to interfere. The special leave petition is dismissed.

We however, left all questions of law open to be considered in an appropriate matter.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(INDU MARWAH) (SUMAN JAIN)

COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER

LEGAL REFERENCES

CBDT

CONCEPTS

Supreme Court

Similar Ripples

Questions

There is no question

INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR. VS SOUTH YARRA HOLDINGS-(Supreme Court)

Write your Comment

Generic

Reportdata/415_F68RRNU.pdf

Would you like to edit this news ? Edit

Select Format

You get opportunity to take 30 day Challenge program.

Optional

Advanced

You get opportunity to take 30 day Challenge program.

Optional

Add tags

You get opportunity to take 30 day Challenge program.

Optional

PUBLISH IT

Don't sell
PUBLISH IT
Publish privately
SAVE AS DRAFT

Dont't publish now

Hi Thakurani,
I want to withdraw in my Thakurani wallet
Thanks,

Select the reason for validity check

I feel great..the news is still good.please give the reason too..thanks..

Why do you think the News as invalid?” Please mention the reason.

I appreciate your effort. May I request you to select one of the reasons from below.
I am marking this post and your reason to Thakurani Moderators. They will take appropriate action.
Thanks,

Write your reason

My Dear ,

Harassing

Spam

Ingenuine

Rotten

Alien

Plagiarism

Unformatted

INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR. VS SOUTH YARRA HOLDINGS-(Supreme Court)