In Oriental Bank of Commerce’s case, assessment was completed u/s 143(3) (of Income Tax Act, 1961) after making disallowances. Pending assessee’s appeal before CIT(A), AO sought to rectify assessment on issues of wrong claim of depreciation and business loss. AO u/s 154 (of Income Tax Act, 1961) withdrew excess depreciation. CIT(A) confirmed AO’s order. ITAT quashed the order holding that issue of deprecation on wooden interiors required examination of details and cannot be rectified u/s 154 (of Income Tax Act, 1961).-500669
1. Oriental Bank of comerce was a public sector undertaking bank.
2. It disclosed total income of Rs. 174,45,44,140.
3. Assessment was completed u/s 143(3) (of Income Tax Act, 1961) at a total income of Rs. 664,17,56,342 after making several disallowances.
4. Being aggrieved by the disallowances, appellant preferred an appeal before CIT(A).
5. While the matter stood thus, the AO sought to rectify the assessment order on the issues of wrong claim of depreciation, and claim of business loss.
6. AO u/s 154 (of Income Tax Act, 1961) withdrew excess depreciation of Rs. 12,14,26,196.
7. CIT(A) confirmed the AO’s order.
On appeal, the ITAT held as under:
8. We hold that the issue whether the deprecation @100% or 15% on interiors which are purely wooden structures is a debatable point as it requires examination of details and cannot be rectified by exercising the power vested under Section 154 (of Income Tax Act, 1961).
9. Therefore, we quash the order of the Assessing Officer dated 30th November, 2007 passed under section 154 (of Income Tax Act, 1961) and allow this ground of appeal.
Case Reference - Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. ACIT
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: 'E': NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND
SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No. 21/Del/2011
(Assessment Year: 2005-06)