The Supreme Court, taking into account Circular No.3/2018 issued by the Government of India, CBDT, New Delhi, and noting that the tax effect falls below the prescribed limit, has decided not to intervene in the challenged order issued by the High Court. However, the Court has preserved the opportunity to address any legal questions in suitable cases. Consequently, the special leave petition has been dismissed, and any pending applications have been disposed of.

The Supreme Court, taking into consideration Circular No.3/2018 issued by the Government of India, CBDT, New Delhi, and noting that the tax effect is below the prescribed limit mentioned in the circular, has decided not to intervene in the challenged order issued by the High Court. However, the Court has left open the possibility of addressing any legal questions in appropriate cases in the future. Consequently, the special leave petition has been dismissed, and any pending applications have been disposed of.
(Ashok Raj Singh) (Chander Bala)

Keeping in view the Circular No.3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 issued by the Government of India, C.B.D.T., New Delhi coupled with the fact that the tax effect is less than the limit fixed in the said Circular, we are not
inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the
High Court.
However, question of law, if any, is kept open for
being decided in appropriate cases.
The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(Ashok Raj Singh) (Chander Bala)
Court Master Court Master