Full News
High Court dismissed ESIC’s wirt petition and set aside costs
High Court dismissed ESIC’s wirt petition and set aside costs
Sh Jaswant Singh challenged the selection of respondents No 3, 4 and one Dr. Leena Chawla by Employee State Insurance Corporation (ESIC). Tribunal quashed the appointments, and directed Competent Authority to consider Jawant Singh for relevant appointment, and imposed costs on Appointing Authority. The High Court dismissed the wirt petition filed by ESIC and set aside the costs imposed.-500337
1. The 1st respondent Jaswant Singh was aggrieved by the selection of respondents No.3, 4 and one Dr. Leena Chawla by Employee State Insurance Corporation, without any relaxation of qualification with regard to experience granted by the Appointing Authority.
2. The recommendation was made by the Selection Committee as per rules.
3. The Tribunal held the appointment as totally unacceptable, and directed Competent Authority to consider the 1st respondent for the relevant appointment.
The High Court held as under:
4. The officer who held the appointment process, namely, Sh. S.K. Srivastava was holding only addditional charge for a brief period from 06.08.2009 to 17.11.2009 during which period the said appointment was made.
5. Further, we find that the order passed by the Tribunal was stayed by this Court.
6. Therefore, we have no hesitation to set aside the costs imposed on the Appointing Authority by the Tribunal.
Case Reference - Employees State Insurance Corporation and another Vs. Jaswant Singh and others.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGAR
CWP No.11196 of 2011
Date of decision: November 28, 2015
×
