Court rules on GST applicability for Indian Medical Association’s services to members, emphasizing mutuality principle.

Get the full picture - access the original judgement of the court order here

Case Name:

Indian Medical Association, Kerala State Branch vs. Union of India and others (High Court of Kerala)

W.A.No.1659 of 2024

Date: 11th April 2025

Key Takeaways:

• The court upheld the principle of mutuality, stating that services provided by a club to its members do not constitute a taxable supply.
• The amendments to the GST law that retroactively imposed tax on such services were declared unconstitutional.
• The ruling emphasizes the importance of fairness in taxation and the need for clear legislative authority when imposing taxes.

Issue:

Is the Indian Medical Association liable to pay GST on services rendered to its members, given the principle of mutuality?

Facts:

1. The IMA, representing medical professionals in Kerala, was apprehensive about potential coercive actions from the Directorate General of GST Intelligence regarding tax recovery on services provided to its members.
2. The IMA argued that it was not liable for GST due to the mutuality principle, which suggests that services rendered by a club to its members are not taxable as they are essentially self-serving.
3. The GST law was amended in 2021 to include provisions that deemed services between clubs and their members as taxable, retroactively effective from July 1, 2017.

Arguments:

• For the IMA:
• The IMA contended that the principle of mutuality protects them from GST liability, as they provide services to their members, who are essentially the same entity.
• They argued that the retroactive application of the GST amendments was unfair and unconstitutional, violating principles of fairness and the rule of law.
• For the Union of India:
• The government argued that the amendments to the GST law were within legislative powers and aimed to clarify the taxability of services provided by clubs to their members.
• They maintained that the principle of mutuality had been effectively overridden by the new provisions, allowing for taxation.

Key Legal Precedents:

• Calcutta Club Ltd. v. State of West Bengal (2019) 19 SCC 107: This case established that the principle of mutuality survives even after the 46th Amendment to the Constitution, which introduced GST.
• Ranchi Club v. Chief Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (2012) SCC Online SC 306: This case reinforced that there cannot be a service between a club and its members, as they are considered one entity.

Judgment:

The High Court ruled in favor of the IMA, declaring the amendments to the GST law (specifically Section 2(17)(e) and Section 7(1)(aa) of the CGST Act) unconstitutional and void. The court emphasized that the principle of mutuality should apply, meaning that services provided by the IMA to its members do not constitute a taxable supply. The court also noted that the retroactive application of the amendments was unfair and violated the rule of law.

FAQs:

1. What does the ruling mean for the IMA?

• The IMA is not liable to pay GST on services provided to its members, preserving its financial stability and operations.

2. What is the principle of mutuality?

• The principle of mutuality states that a club or association and its members are considered one entity, meaning services provided to members are not taxable as they are self-serving.

3. What are the implications of the court’s decision?

• The ruling sets a precedent for similar organizations, reinforcing that they may not be liable for GST on services rendered to their members under the mutuality principle.

4. Can the government amend the GST law again?

• While the government can amend laws, any future amendments must respect the principles established by the court and cannot retroactively impose taxes without clear legislative authority.