Full News

Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c
Financial Statements non FILING

NBFC Faces Penalties for Failure to File Financial Statements

NBFC Faces Penalties for Failure to File Financial Statements

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has imposed substantial penalties on an NBFC and its directors for failure to submit Form AOC-4 NBFC, under Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 12(1A) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. Despite the company's defense citing the non-applicability of Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) based on its net worth, the adjudicating officer found the violation substantiated and imposed penalties accordingly.

In a recent case, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has taken decisive action against Kudos Finance And Investments Private Limited, a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), and its directors for failing to comply with the provisions of Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013.


The Violation

The crux of the matter lies in the company's omission to file Form AOC-4 NBFC with the MCA for the financial year 2020-2021. This form is a crucial requirement for NBFCs, as mandated by Section 137 read with Rule 12(1A) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014. The form serves as a means for NBFCs to submit their financial statements, ensuring transparency and adherence to regulatory norms.


In response to the non-compliance, the Registrar of Companies (ROC) in Pune initiated adjudication proceedings, appointing an Adjudicating Officer under the provisions of Section 454(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 3(1) of the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014. The Adjudicating Officer issued notices to the company and its directors, providing them with an opportunity to respond to the alleged violation.


The Arguments:

Kudos Finance And Investments Private Limited argued that the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) and, consequently, the AOC-4 NBFC filing requirement were not applicable to them based on their net worth. However, the Adjudicating Officer found this defense unsatisfactory and proceeded to impose penalties on the company and its directors for the non-filing of Form AOC-4 NBFC.


The Decision:

The penalties were levied in accordance with Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, which stipulates financial consequences for non-compliance with filing requirements. The company was fined Rs. 64,700, while the directors, including Pavitra Pradip Walvekar, Swati Jindal, Naresh Vigh, Audumbar Dattatray Raut, and Rizwan Hasan Shaikh, were each fined Rs. 50,000, subject to a maximum penalty of Rs. 50,000 per director.


The Adjudicating Officer's order underscores the gravity of the violation and the consequences of disregarding statutory obligations. The penalties imposed serve as a deterrent and a reminder to companies and their directors of the importance of adhering to regulatory requirements, fostering transparency, and upholding the principles of good corporate governance.


FAQs:

Q1. What was the primary violation committed by Kudos Finance And Investments Private Limited?

A1.The company failed to file Form AOC-4 NBFC with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) for the financial year 2020-2021, as required under Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 12(1A) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.


Q2.Why is the filing of Form AOC-4 NBFC crucial for Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)?

A2.Form AOC-4 NBFC is a mandatory filing requirement for NBFCs, as it serves as a means to submit their financial statements to the MCA, ensuring transparency and adherence to regulatory norms.


Q3.What was the company's defense against the alleged violation?

A3.Kudos Finance And Investments Private Limited argued that the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) and, consequently, the AOC-4 NBFC filing requirement were not applicable to them based on their net worth.


Q4. What were the penalties imposed on the company and its directors?

A4.The company was fined Rs. 64,700, while the directors, including Pavitra Pradip Walvekar, Swati Jindal, Naresh Vigh, Audumbar Dattatray Raut, and Rizwan Hasan Shaikh, were each fined Rs. 50,000, subject to a maximum penalty of Rs. 50,000 per director.


Q5. What is the significance of this case for companies and their directors

A5.This case serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to statutory filing obligations and the potential consequences of non-compliance. It highlights the MCA's commitment to upholding corporate governance standards and enforcing regulatory requirements across the board.