Punch your phone number in the box below
I’II send an OTP on it.
I won’t confide your phone with anyone.
My Dear ,
Please write your reason against the objection raised in the box below.
I appreciate your effort.
May I request you to select one of the reasons for purging from below.
Disrespectful or rude towards a person or a group.
Promotes an undisclosed link or product or service.
Not seeking genuine answers .
Vulgar, Obscene, abusive etc..
Not a post on law or business.
Copied from other website or source and pasted here.
Has bad format, grammar, spelling so requires moderatation.
Thank you,
Yours sincerely,
Aaradhika, Thakurani's bestie
My Dear friends, Please feel free to ask us any question on income tax, GST, and company law matters.
Procedure to be followed in calculating interest.
Held High Court of Karnataka in the case of Fatheraj Singhvi St Ors 289 CTR …
M/s. Sarala Memorial Hospital vs. ITO (TDS) in WP(C) No.37775 of 2018 (judgment…
Held In case, there is a default or delay in submitting the TDS statements, …
Held There was delay of 315 days in submitting the quarterly TDS statement f…
Held This issue had come up for adjudication before us in the Raipur Bench o…
None for the Assessee. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR for the Revenue.
Vijay Jindal, CA for the Petitioner. Rakhi Vimal, SR. DR for the Respondent.
None for the Petitioner. Rakhi Vimal, Sr. DR. for the Respondent.
Held An identical issue came up in batch of appeals before the Pune Bench of…
Held For the AY 2013-14, there is no dispute that the assessee delivered the…
For computation and intimation for payment of fee u/s 234E demand u/s 200A can …
The case involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 234E of…
Held Common issue raised in all these bunches of appeals is that whether the…
Held Common issue raised in all these bunches of appeals is that whether CIT…
Held Common issue raised in all these bunches of appeals is that whether CIT…
Nitish Ranjan, C.A. for the Assessee. Manjeet Singh, Addl. CIT (D.R) for the Re…
Held Karnataka High Court in case of Fateraj Singvi & Ors. held as under : …
Fee for default in furnishing statements.
(1) Without prejudice to the provisions of the Act, where a person fails to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C, he shall be liable to pay, by way of fee, a sum of two hundred rupees for every day during which the failure continues.
(2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be.
(3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C.
(4) The provisions of this section shall apply to a statement referred to in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C which is to be delivered or caused to be delivered for tax deducted at source or tax collected at source, as the case may be, on or after the 1st day of July, 2012.
Check your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 6 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itCheck your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 6 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itCheck your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 5 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itThanks, for confirming your phone number.
You can change it in your profile.Are you a tax professional?
If yes, then you can earn
money through me.
download the mobile app
You have successfully created your diary. You can access it from 'Store/Your Stuff' section.
OK