This case involved several petitioners who challenged the Kerala State Housing Board’s (KSHB) use of revenue recovery proceedings to collect unpaid housing loans. The petitioners argued that the Housing Board was not authorized to give such loans or recover them in this manner. The High Court rejected these arguments, confirming the Board’s authority to both grant housing loans and recover dues through revenue recovery, provided the loans were given under government-approved schemes.
Get the full picture - access the original judgement of the court order here
K. Surendran & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors. (High Court of Kerala)
WP(C)No. 30610 of 2013 with connected cases WP(C)No. 1830/2014 and WP(C) No. 3301/2014
Date: 11th March 2024
Can the Kerala State Housing Board lawfully grant housing loans and recover unpaid amounts through revenue recovery proceedings, even though it is not a bank or NBFC, and even if the loans are not for “development projects”?
Petitioners
Respondents (State & Housing Board)
Note: The judgment does not cite any previous case law by name; it relies on statutory interpretation and government notifications.
Q1: Can the Kerala State Housing Board give housing loans?
A: Yes, as long as the loans are given under government-approved schemes as per Section 41(2) of the Kerala State Housing Board Act, 1971.
Q2: Is the Housing Board a bank or NBFC?
A: No, it is a statutory body, not a bank or non-banking financial company, so the Banking Regulation Act and RBI Act do not apply.
Q3: Can the Board use revenue recovery to collect unpaid loans?
A: Yes, SRO No. 311/76 authorizes the Board to recover all dues (not just “development project” loans) under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968.
Q4: What if a borrower wants to settle dues now?
A: The court allowed petitioners who haven’t settled to approach the Board for installment payments or a one-time settlement, and the Board should consider waiving interest for the period the case was pending.
Q5: Did the court find any fault with the Board’s actions?
A: No, the court found the Board acted within its legal powers and dismissed the petitions.