Full News

RBI, FEMA & BANKING
Regulatory Guidelines for Investments in Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) by Regulated Entities (REs)

RBI Fortifies Defenses Against Evergreening Through AIF Investments

RBI Fortifies Defenses Against Evergreening Through AIF Investments

The Reserve Bank of India has issued a comprehensive circular to curb the practice of evergreening loan exposures through investments in Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs). The guidelines prohibit regulated entities from investing in AIF schemes with downstream investments in debtor companies and mandate immediate divestment or provisioning for existing exposures.

Detailed Narrative:

In a bold move to safeguard the integrity of the financial system, India’s central banking authority has unveiled stringent measures to prevent regulated entities (REs) from using Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) as a conduit for evergreening their loan exposures. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued a circular that addresses regulatory concerns over the substitution of direct loan exposures with indirect exposures through AIF investments.


The circular acknowledges that REs, such as banks, financial institutions, and non-banking finance companies, commonly invest in AIFs as part of their regular investment operations. However, the RBI has identified certain transactions that raise red flags, prompting the need for immediate action to maintain the integrity of the financial system.


At the core of the new guidelines lies a strict prohibition on REs investing in AIF schemes that have downstream investments, either directly or indirectly, in debtor companies of the RE. A debtor company is defined as any company to which the RE currently has or previously had a loan or investment exposure within the preceding 12 months.


In a decisive move, the RBI has mandated that if an AIF scheme, in which an RE is already an investor, makes a downstream investment in a debtor company, the RE must liquidate its investment within 30 days from the date of such downstream investment. For existing investments in such schemes as of the circular’s issuance date, the 30-day liquidation period commences immediately.


Failure to comply with the liquidation deadline will result in severe consequences. REs that are unable to liquidate their investments within the prescribed time limit must make a 100 percent provision on such investments, effectively rendering them worthless on their balance sheets.


Furthermore, the circular addresses investments in subordinated units of AIF schemes with a “priority distribution model.” Such investments will be subject to a full deduction from the RE’s capital funds, underscoring the RBI’s commitment to maintaining robust capital adequacy standards.


The circular’s immediate effectiveness emphasizes the urgency with which the RBI expects regulated entities to comply with these directives. The central bank’s proactive stance sends a clear message: evergreening practices through AIF transactions will not be tolerated, and the integrity of the financial system must be upheld at all costs.

FAQs:

Q1: What is the primary objective of the RBI’s circular?

A1: The circular aims to prevent regulated entities from using Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) as a means to evergreen their loan exposures, thereby mitigating potential risks to the financial system.


Q2: What is the definition of a “debtor company” in the context of this circular?

A2: A debtor company is any company to which the regulated entity currently has or previously had a loan or investment exposure within the preceding 12 months.


Q3: What is the consequence if an RE fails to liquidate its investment in an AIF scheme with downstream exposure to a debtor company within the prescribed time limit?

A3: If an RE is unable to liquidate its investment within the 30-day time limit, it must make a 100 percent provision on such investments, effectively rendering them worthless on their balance sheets.


Q4: How does the circular address investments in subordinated units of AIF schemes with a “priority distribution model”?

A4: Investments by REs in subordinated units of AIF schemes with a “priority distribution model” will be subject to a full deduction from the RE’s capital funds.


Q5: When do the guidelines outlined in the circular become effective?

A5: The guidelines outlined in the circular are effective immediately, emphasizing the urgency with which regulated entities must comply.


Q6: Can you provide an example of how evergreening through AIF investments might occur?

A6: Certainly. A debtor company facing difficulties in repaying a loan or installment to a lender could provide the lender with a list of mutual funds or fund houses that have invested in the debtor company’s equity or debt through AIFs. The lender could then invest in the AIF with an understanding that the funds will be invested partly or fully in the debtor company. The debtor company can then use the funds received from the AIF, typically as debt, to repay the lender on the due date. This allows the debtor company to obtain additional financing or fresh funds from the lender after clearing old dues, effectively evergreening the loan exposure.