Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate Rohit Jain, Himanshu Aggarwal, Advocates for the Revenue. A. Renganath, Advocate for Ajit Sharma for the Respondent.

1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the assessment order dated 30th April, 2021 and the consequential notices issued under Section 156 (of Income Tax Act, 1961) and Section 274 (of Income Tax Act, 1961) read with Section 270A (of Income Tax Act, 1961) (‘the Act’).

2. It was stated in the petition that assessment order was passed under Section 143(3) (of Income Tax Act, 1961) read with Section 144B (of Income Tax Act, 1961), raising a substantial tax and interest demand of Rs.86,62,88,770/-, without serving the petitioner with the mandatory draft assessment order along with show cause notice, as contemplated in Section 144B (of Income Tax Act, 1961), although, the petitioner’s declared income was varied to its prejudice.

3. Notice was issued in the present writ petition on 18th May, 2021 and the counsel for the respondent had sought time to take instructions in the present matter. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned orders was stayed.

4. Today, the learned counsel for the respondent states that he has received instructions in the matter to the effect that the impugned orders may be set aside and the matter may be remanded to the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) for determining the matter afresh.

5. For framing assessment under Section 143(3) (of Income Tax Act, 1961), in terms of Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) (of Income Tax Act, 1961) (as it stood prior to the amendment brought into effect by the Finance Act, 2022), the National Faceless Assessment Centre (‘NaFAC’) before making a variation to the income which is prejudicial to the assessee, was mandated to provide an opportunity to the assessee to show cause as to why the proposed variation should not be made and such a notice should be accompanied with the draft assessment order, proposed to be passed.

6. In the present case, admittedly, no show cause notice, as contemplated under Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) (of Income Tax Act, 1961) was served on the petitioner, thereby depriving the petitioner of its statutory right to file a response as well as place the documents on record in support of its response and to be heard before passing of the final assessment order.

7. We therefore, set aside the assessment order dated 30th April, 2021 and the consequential notices issued under Section 156 (of Income Tax Act, 1961) and Section 274 (of Income Tax Act, 1961) read with Section 270A (of Income Tax Act, 1961) and remand the matter to the respondent No. 1 to complete the assessment proceedings within a period of twelve weeks from today, in accordance with law.

8. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy in the writ petition.

9. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

MANMOHAN, J

OCTOBER 6, 2022