Here is Portfolio page of Shrayan, with all his work

Reject'n of Addit'nl ground raised by assessee before Tribunal held incorrect.
Nov. 26, 2015
Assessee challenged Tribunal's order of refusal to admit additi'nl ground raised as it did not arise out of order of First Appellate Authority. HC held, Commissioner may or may not have rendered any view on it as First Appellate Authority, does not mean that Tribunal was precluded in law from considering same after it was specifically raised by assessee before it. Thus, question of law answered in favor of the assessee & against the revenue. -000119
HC denied writ jurisdict'n as grievances of petit'nr factual & not perverse.
Dec. 11, 2015
Petitioner applied to CBDT for approval of its Industrial Park u/s 80-IA of I.T. Act. CBDT had denied approval u/s 80-IA of Income Tax Act. On writ, HC held, In view of conduct of petitioner in putting before Authority figures which when confronted with were substituted with new figures. Also, grievances of petitioner being factual which are not shown in any manner to be perverse/ arbitrary, would not warrant exercise of writ jurisdic…
What can I do if the buyer of our land does not give us the TDS certificate after deducting TDS from us?
Feb. 06, 2017
Delay in filling of SLP relating to Transfer pricing issue condoned by SC.
Nov. 06, 2015
HC on finding that (TPO) had proposed to make adjustment in arms length price without giving opportunity of personal hearing to assessee, remitted matter back to TPO for giving opportunity of hearing to assessee. On SLP SC condoned delay & held, as HC has remitted matter to TPO from whose order appeal is pending before CIT(A), it would be in interest of both sides to resort to Alternate Dispute Resolution Mechanism suggested in Budget of 2009.-010…
If assessee Res./ NR u/s 4A to be considered, when assessable inc. determined
Nov. 14, 2015
Assessee-Co had head office in London & branches in Ind.. EPTO treated assessee as NR in assesmnt. yr. as its foreign profits more than Indian profits & determined standard profits. AAC confirmed order of EPTO. On appeal Tribinal held, question, whether assessee was resident or NR u/s 4A to be considered at stage when assessable income was being determined. HC & SC upheld it: EPTO to have added both Indian profits & London profits for both years.
Is the concept of smart cities in India a far away reality?

If you look at the budget, its around RS.98, 000 crore ($15 billion) for 100 smart cities. So each city will get RS.980 crore. Thats not sufficient to build modern smart cities. But, we are not going to build very modern cities like Singapore, we will make somethig which is just enough for us.
High Court appointed an arbitrator where valid arbitration clause existed
Aug. 15, 2016
Petitioner insured its factory with respondent under Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy. Following a fire in the premises petitioner lodged a claim with respondent, who appointed a surveyor. Petitioner invoked the arbitration clause of the policy for the balance claim amount, and filed a petition u/s 11(6) for appointment of an arbitrator. The High Court allowed the petition and appointed an arbitrator. -500106
Plaintiff's application for enhancement of valuation of suit allowed
Aug. 12, 2016
Plaintiff filed an application under Order VI Rule 17 & s 151 CPC for amendment of the plaint, for enhancement of the valuation of the suit for the purposes of Court fee and jurisdiction, as the defendants has flooded the market with their product TRANSFLUTHRIN thereby infringing the plaintiff's patent. The Court allowed the plaintiffs application.
On basis of subsequent info received by AO, proceedings u/s 147 held justified.
Nov. 20, 2015
Tribunal quashed proceeding u/s 147 due to non-mentioning of reason that there was failure on part of assessee to disclose all material facts fully & truly necessary for assessment. On appeal HC held, immaterial, If ITO in original assessment found genuineness of transaction or not. If later info. satisfy that assessee had not made full & true disclosure of material facts during original assessment. Concluded, taxable income escaped assessm…
Exempt. u/s 10B allowed as product'n of raw honey held manufacturing in nature.
Dec. 08, 2015
Assessee mfd. raw honey exported it. In return it claimed exempt. u/s 10B. AO allowed it. Commissioner held, assessee removed moisture from raw honey & repacked it, which is not manufacturing activities. Thus, set aside assessm't. On appeal ITAT held AO correct, as process carried on by assessee reflected steps undertaken by it to bring into existence finished product distinct from raw honey which is collected by beekeepers from bee-hives.