Here is Portfolio page of Shrayan, with all his work

What can I do if the buyer of our land does not give us the TDS certificate after deducting TDS from us?
Feb. 06, 2017
Meaning of profit u/s 80HHC depend on context in which it is used, held SC.
Nov. 09, 2015
Assessees claim of deduction u/s 80HHC was disallowed on ground that profits of business computed as per Sec. indicated negative figure. CIT upheld it. Tribunal held against CIT. HC again reversed it. SC dismissed appeal stating, term profit in Sec. 80HHC both in sub-Sec.(1) & in sub-Sec.(3) means positive profit worked out after taking into consideration losses, if any. Thus, word profit has same meaning in Sec. 80HHC(1) & (3).
ITAT upheld disallowance of Rs 2 lakhs to plug possible leakages
Dec. 01, 2016
Dr Vikaramsinha Kakasaheb paid a salary of Rs 19.5 lakhs to his doctor wife, who worked at his nursing home. A.O. observed that assessee had made higher payments to his wife as compared to other doctors. A.O. considered Rs 6 lakhs as reasonable salary and balance of Rs 13.5 lakhs as unreasonable u/s 40A(2)(b). CIT(A) sustained a disallowance of Rs 2 lakhs to plug possible leakages. ITAT upheld CIT(A)s order. - 500439
What is the process involved in launching a start-up in India?

Register the company=>Go for private limited company=>Pick a good bank
Exempt. u/s 11 of I.T.Act allowed as requirements u/s 2(15) I.T.Act fulfilled.
Dec. 11, 2015
Assessee-sty promoted & advanced med. science & promoted improvem't of public health & med. educat'n. In return, it claimed exempt. of income u/s 11. AO held, assessee sty. failed to comply with requirements of Sec 2(15), thus he rejected assessee's claim. CIT(A), held assessee's activities fell u/s 2(15), thus allowed claim. On appeal ITAT held, assessee has endorsed products on claims of health & nutritional benefit, thus claim al…
Illiterate tax payers should be dealt more sympathetically by Income Tax Dept.SC
Nov. 09, 2015
Assessee in return showed income. Agri. ITO under circumstances assessee directed to submit fresh return & to produce account books & filure would lead to assessment u/s 25(5) of Act. On non appearance ITO assessed income. On appeal SC held, Ignorant & illiterate people who are not, well versed with law of income-tax should be dealt with more sympathetically than was done here. They should not be penalised in manner that assesses was penalised.-010…
Revision petition allowed as no material against the petitioner accused
Aug. 12, 2016
Petitioner, a chit fund company, induced the respondent to invest with the petitioner. Despite requests for release of matured chit amount, it was not released and respondent filed a complaint u/s 200 & 156 (3) Cr. P. C. before the Ld. Magistrate, and an FIR was registered. Petitioner filed a revision before the Special Judge who held that there was no material to proceed against petitioner and allowed the revision petition. -500080
Issue determining accumulated profit needed to be re-examined by AO held ITAT.
Nov. 04, 2015
Assessee's, 'Y' & 'T', were directors in closely held company VEIL. AO assessed amounts given by VEIL as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) in respective hands of assessees. CIT held against it. On appeal ITAT held, Since issue of determination of accumulated profits needs to be re examined, it is to be restored to AO for purpose of determination of 'accumulated profits'. CIT order thus was set aside as issue of accumulated profits to be reexamined.-0105…
Reg. application declined by ITO as firm belonged to 1 partner only, right, SC
Nov. 14, 2015
A new firm was constituted by partners. application for reg. made u/s 26A. ITO declined reg., holding that firm belonged solely to C, & there was only pretense of firm. On appeal AAC, allowed it. On appeal Tribunal & HC held ITO right. On appeal SC held, Tribunal order proceeded on solid facts that speculation about motive of C did not make any material diff. to finding reached. There was material on which finding could be based.-010517