Here is Portfolio page of Shrayan, with all his work

Shrayan -- Portfolio

Shrayan

new Delhi I am a Digital marketer @thakurani

Call me Ask me

Company ordered to deposit principal amounts to stay liquidator's action
Aug. 16, 2016
In a company petition was admitted and the company was directed to be wound up. In another petition, company indicated its willingness to settle with the petitioner-creditor. Company did not pay. Court ordered Official Liquidator's to take control of the company's assets. High Court ordered the company to deposit principal amounts covered by the claims of two petitioning creditors for the Official Liquidator to be asked to stay his hands. -500141
As exp. nt resulted in capital asset, so to be recorded as exp. in capital field
Dec. 11, 2015
Assessee incurred certain exp. on brand building which was claimed as deduct'n u/s 37(1). AO held, exp. resulted in enduring benefit. Thus, he disallowed claim by treating it as capital exp.. However, CIT(A) allowed exp. in entirety holding it as routine operational exp..On appeal, ITAT held, As exp. has not resulted in capital asset, so has to be recorded as exp. in capital field. It can't be attributed to capital exp. on brand building.
High Court partially allowed appeal and ordered back wages @25%
Aug. 12, 2016
The respondent/workman was employed with DTC as a driver, and raised an industrial dispute alleging termination. On his claim, the management advised him light duty, but subsequently he was not allowed to do so and he sought reinstatement. Labour held that termination was bad as no approval was taken u/s 33(2)(b). High Court partially allowing the appeal allowed back wages @ 25%.-500098
Reg. application declined by ITO as firm belonged to 1 partner only, right, SC
Nov. 14, 2015
A new firm was constituted by partners. application for reg. made u/s 26A. ITO declined reg., holding that firm belonged solely to C, & there was only pretense of firm. On appeal AAC, allowed it. On appeal Tribunal & HC held ITO right. On appeal SC held, Tribunal order proceeded on solid facts that speculation about motive of C did not make any material diff. to finding reached. There was material on which finding could be based.-010517
Should Indian companies like Flipkart and Ola be provided state protection against global rivals Amazon and Uber?

Not really! You know why ..because the overall concept of competition will have no meaning. When theses companies compete with each other, they really fight hard to gain customers trust. This can only happen when these companies provide quality services of exceptional standard, consumer friendly, economical, efficient and yet the best.
Repair Exp. on office/Lab. damaged by natural calamity treated as revenue Exp.
Nov. 02, 2015
Assessee-company kolkata office was damaged by fire & its goa laboratory by flood/cyclone. It incurred certain expenditure in respect of its office & laboratory. It claimed said expenditure u/s 30.AO disallowed it holding that same was to be treated as an expenditure of a capital nature.On appeal, CIT (A) Held, that entire expenditure was of revenue nature & therefore, deductible.On appeal, ITAT & HC upheld the order of CIT (A).-000259
Assessee given opportunity to furnish evidences to justify exp. incurred.
Nov. 02, 2015
AO disallowed expenditure claimed by assessee on ground of non explaination of business expediency of incurring such expenses at abnormal rate. On appeal CIT(A) allowed it. On appeal, ITAT reduced amount. On appeal HC directed AO to permit assessee to adduce such evidence as assessee wants to rely upon to show that sum of Rs.11 crores was incurred by assessee for appropriate reasons & thereafter consider matter in accordance with law. -000271
Is the concept of smart cities in India a far away reality?

If you look at the budget, its around RS.98, 000 crore ($15 billion) for 100 smart cities. So each city will get RS.980 crore. Thats not sufficient to build modern smart cities. But, we are not going to build very modern cities like Singapore, we will make somethig which is just enough for us.
Revision petition allowed as no material against the petitioner accused
Aug. 12, 2016
Petitioner, a chit fund company, induced the respondent to invest with the petitioner. Despite requests for release of matured chit amount, it was not released and respondent filed a complaint u/s 200 & 156 (3) Cr. P. C. before the Ld. Magistrate, and an FIR was registered. Petitioner filed a revision before the Special Judge who held that there was no material to proceed against petitioner and allowed the revision petition. -500080
How is TDS deducted from contractors for sub contractors?

The contractor is liable to deduct and pay TDS to the credit of the Government 1% (20% if PAN is not available)

Here is business page of Shrayan, with all his work

About Portfolio

Welcome to the Market

You are at the Mall

Make money by giving answers

Ripples not for everyone

Work at times when you like

Marginalia on Sale

Diary on Sale

Simple Videos on complicated business maters

Start Earning

Shows all items that can make you money

Dashboard

Quaremon

Shocks n Mocks

Job Harbor

For Sale

Yearwise

Premium

Sorry, phoning is not for you. You need to be atleast on Princess plan to make calls.

Do you want to subscribe ? I would give you a free coupon to help you start calling.

Ok , no issues, if you have a question then you can try the search feature at quaremon.

Shrayan -- Portfolio

Shrayan

My dear ,

My dear ,

Shyam, I welcome you to booking page

Welcome Shyam,

Hello Shyam,

Sorry, phoning is not for you. You need to be atleast on Princess plan to make calls.

Do you want to subscribe ? I would give you a free coupon to help you start calling.

Ok , no issues, if you have a question then you can try the search feature at quaremon.