Here is Portfolio page of Arpit, with all his work

What is the amendment brought in by Budget 2018 in Section 80DDB of the Act?

Feb. 02, 2018
Why did Bombay HC not uphold tax officer's penalty order?
Feb. 07, 2018
Bombay HC in the case of Shankar D. Dhanwatey and Others held that it is necessary that the succeeding tax officer intimates the assessee before passing the order about his intention to continue the proceedings from the stage at which they were left by his predecessor.
Tutorial 1: Applicability of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965
Dec. 15, 2016
The Payment of Bonus Act(POBA) was enacted to impose statutory obligation on the employer to pay certain amount of bonus to those employees who falls within a specified category. If the employer will share certain amount of surplus with its employees, it will ensure peace and harmony between the employer and the employee. To know whether provisions of the Act are applicable to your entity, continue reading under details section.
PM Narendra Modi New Year Speech
Dec. 31, 2016
Hello folks, here we are sharing with you key takeaways from PM Narendra Modi Speech given today 31st December, 2016 at 7:30 p.m. The main intention of PM was to calm the people of India because of the hardships faced by them due to demonetisation move of the Government. For this, slew of measures were announced which are elaborated below:
Zydus, go ahead and claim depreciation on goodwill - HC(Guj)
Nov. 20, 2017
Recently, the Gujarat HC in case of Zydus Wellness Ltd. held that depreciation on goodwill is allowed under Section 32 of the Act. Further, the High Court observed that claim if not made earlier can be made before Appellate Authorities.
GTA registered in Delhi and recipient registered in Haryana, recipient tax deposit IGST or CGST and SGST
Jul. 17, 2017
What if A.O does not grant stay of demand?

Then you can make the said application to same CIT(A) with whom your appeal lies. In most of the cases CIT(A) will grant the stay of demand.
Distinction between making of profit and being carried on for profit, Explained
May. 23, 2017
The Supreme Court in the case of Queen's Educational Society held that a distinction must be drawn between the making of surplus and an institution being carried on for profit. Merely because imparting of education results in making a surplus, it cannot be inferred that it becomes an activity for profit.