This is a relatively straightforward but important GST case where a manufacturer of mango pulp challenged the government’s decision to charge GST @ 18% on their product. The petitioner argued that mango pulp should either be exempt from GST or taxed at a lower rate. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh agreed that 18% was wrong, and clarified — backed by a Government of India circular — that mango pulp attracts GST @ 12%, not 18%. A partial win for the petitioner
Get the full picture - access the original judgement of the court order here
M/s. Foods and Inns Ltd Vs Union of India
Court Name: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Case No.: Writ Petition No. 17267 of 2022
Bench: The Honourable Sri Justice C. Praveen Kumar and The Honourable Sri Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu
Date of Decision: 14th September 2022
1. 18% GST on Mango Pulp was WRONG — The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling had incorrectly classified mango pulp under Schedule III attracting 18% GST. The High Court corrected this.
2.🟢 Correct GST Rate is 12% — The Government of India’s own circular dated 03.08.2022 clarified that all forms of dried mangoes (other than sliced and dried mangoes), including mango pulp, falling under heading 0804, attract GST @ 12%.
3.🟡 Fresh Mangoes remain EXEMPT — Fresh mangoes under heading 0804 continue to be exempt from GST under S. No. 51 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28th June, 2017.
4. Sliced, Dried Mangoes attract only 5% — Following the GST Council’s 22nd meeting recommendation, sliced and dried mangoes under heading 0804 were reduced to 5% GST.
5. Government amended the notification to bring clarity — Entry at S. No. 16 of Schedule-II of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28th June, 2017 was amended via Notification No. 6/2022-Central Tax (Rate), dated 13th July, 2022.
Was the GST Authority correct in charging GST @ 18% on ‘Mango Pulp’?
In simpler terms — the core question was: What is the correct GST rate for mango pulp — is it exempt, 12%, or 18%?
🧑💼 Petitioner’s Arguments:
Respondents’ (Tax Authorities’) Arguments:
This case didn’t rely on prior court judgments but heavily referenced statutory notifications and circulars. Here are all the key legal references:
Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Basis for filing the Writ Petition before the High Court
Notification No. 2/2017-CT(Rate) dated 28.06.2017, Entry 51
Petitioner’s claim — exempts fresh mangoes from GST
Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, Entry No. 453, Schedule-III
Basis for AAR/AAAR’s 18% GST ruling on mango pulp
Tariff Item 0804 50 40
Classification heading for mango pulp/puree
Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, S. No. 30A of Schedule I
Covers ‘Mangoes sliced, dried’ at 5% GST
S. No. 16 of Schedule-II of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28th June, 2017
Amended to bring clarity on mango pulp taxation
Notification No. 6/2022-Central Tax (Rate), dated 13th July, 2022
Amendment notification that clarified mango pulp @ 12%
Government of India Circular dated 03.08.2022 (Tax Research Unit)
Key circular clarifying GST rates on all forms of mangoes
S. No. 51 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28th June, 2017
Fresh mangoes remain exempt from GST
The Court’s Decision:
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh disposed of the writ petition with the following key findings:
1. The AAAR’s order imposing GST @ 18% on mango pulp was INCORRECT.
2. The Court relied on the Government of India Circular dated 03.08.2022, which clearly stated that:
3. The Court declared that the petitioner is liable to pay GST on Mango Pulp @ 12% — not 18% as previously ordered by the tax authorities.
4. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, meaning neither party had to pay the other’s legal costs.
5. All miscellaneous petitions pending in the writ petition were also closed.
In short: The petitioner didn’t get full relief (they wanted full exemption), but they did get a significant reduction — from 18% down to 12% GST on mango pulp. A partial but meaningful victory.
Q1: Did the petitioner get what they originally asked for — full exemption from GST?
No, not fully. The petitioner wanted mango pulp to be treated like fresh mangoes and be completely exempt from GST. The Court didn’t grant that, but it did reduce the rate from 18% to 12%.
Q2: Why was 18% GST wrong for mango pulp?
Because the Government of India’s own Circular dated 03.08.2022 clarified that mango pulp, being a form of processed/dried mango under heading 0804, was always meant to attract only 12% GST — not 18%. The tax authorities had been applying the wrong rate.
Q3: What is the difference between fresh mangoes and mango pulp for GST purposes?
Fresh mangoes are completely exempt from GST. Mango pulp is a processed form and attracts 12% GST. Sliced and dried mangoes attract 5% GST.
Q4: What happens to the excess GST (18% - 12% = 6%) already paid by the petitioner for past transactions?
The judgment doesn’t explicitly address refunds for past overpayments. The petitioner may need to file a separate refund claim with the tax authorities for the excess GST paid.
Q5: What is the significance of the Government Circular dated 03.08.2022?
This circular was the turning point of the case. It was issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue (Tax Research Unit) and clarified the GST rates for all forms of mangoes. The Court relied heavily on this circular to correct the AAAR’s erroneous 18% ruling.
Q6: Under which tariff heading is mango pulp classified?
Mango pulp/puree is classified under Tariff Item 0804 50 40 as confirmed by both the AAAR and the High Court.
Q7: Can this judgment be used as a precedent by other mango pulp manufacturers?
Yes, absolutely! This judgment, along with the Government Circular dated 03.08.2022, establishes that mango pulp manufacturers across India should be paying GST @ 12%, not 18%. Other manufacturers who have been charged 18% can rely on this judgment and the circular to seek corrections or refunds.

Heard Sri Mahesh Rai Chanda Nai, learned counsel representing Sri G. Arun Showri, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Y.N. Vivekananda, learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes appearing for respondents 2,5 & 6, and Sri Suresh Kumar Routhu, learned standing counsel appearing
for respondents 3 & 4. Perused the record.
2. The present writ petition came to be filed under Article
226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of
Mandamus directing the respondents 5 & 6 to declare the goods
manufactured by the petitioner as classifiable under Chapter
Heading 0804 50 40 and exempt from GST in terms of entry 51
of Notification No.2/2017-CT(Rate) dated 28.06.2017, apart
from other reliefs.
3. As seen from the record, by an order dated 27.07.2022,
this Court, taking into consideration the submissions made
across the Bar, directed the respondents herein not to take any
coercive steps for recovery of GST @ 18% as contemplated by
them in respect of past transactions and insofar as future
transactions are concerned, in view of the dispute as to whether
‘mangoes’ mentioned in the notification include ‘mango pulp’,
directed that petitioner shall pay GST @ 18%.
4. The question that arises for consideration in the present
writ petition is: Whether the authorities were right in charging
GST, in respect of ‘Mango Pulp’, @ 18%?
5. Before going into the said aspect, it is to be noted here
that on an application made by the petitioner before the
Authority For Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh, in
AAR.No.16/AP/GST/2021, an order came to be passed on
07.07.2021 wherein it was held that the ‘Mango pulp/puree’
falls under the entry no.453 of Schedule-III of Notification
No.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, attracting GST
@ 18%. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner herein preferred an
appeal before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling. An
order came to be passed by the appellate authority on
20.01.2022, which reads as under:
“We hereby modify the Order passed by the Authority for Advance
Ruling vide AAR.No.16/AP/GST/2021 dated 07.07.2021 and hold
that the ‘Mango Pulp/Puree’ is classifiable under Tariff Item 0804
50 40 and chargeable to GST @ 18% by virtue of entry No.453 of
Schedule III in Notification No.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated
28.06.2017.”
6. Referring to the order passed by the Appellate Authority,
learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that pending
the writ petition, the Government of India, Ministry of Finance,
Department of Revenue (Tax Research Unit), issued a Circular
dated 03.08.2022 wherein while referring to Mangoes under
CTH 0804, stated as under:
“4. Mangoes under CTH 0804 including mango pulp, but other
than fresh mangoes and sliced, dried mangoes, attract GST at
12% rate:
4.1. Representations have been received seeking clarification
regarding the applicable GST rate on different forms of Mangoes
including Mango Pulp.
4.2. On the basis of the recommendation of the GST Council in
its 22 Meeting, the GST rate on Mangoes sliced, dried', falling
under heading 0804, was reduced from 12% to 5% [S. No. 30A of
Schedule I of notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated
the 28th June, 2017]. However, the GST rate on all forms of dried
mangoes (other than sliced and dried mangoes), falling under
heading 0804, including mango pulp, was always meant to be at
the rate of 12%.
4.3. Accordingly, it is hereby clarified that mangoes, fresh
falling under heading 0804 are exempt; Mangoes, sliced and
dried, falling under 0804 are chargeable to a concessional rate
of 5%; while all other forms of dried mango, including Mango
pulp, attract GST at the rate of 12%. To bring absolute clarity,
the relevant entry at S. No. 16 of Schedule-II of notification
no.1/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28th June, 2017, has been
amended vide notification No. 6/2022-Central Tax (Rate), dated
the 13th July, 2022.
4.4. Fresh mangoes, falling under heading 0804, continue to
remain exempt from GST (S.No. 51 of notification No. 2/2017-
Central Tax (Rate), dated the 28th June, 2017].”
7. From a reading of the above, it is very clear now that on
the basis of recommendation of GST Council in its 22nd meeting,
the GST rate on ‘Mangoes sliced, dried’ falling under heading
0804 was reduced from 12% to 5% while GST rate on all forms
of dried mangoes (other than sliced and dried mangoes) falling
under heading 0804, including mango pulp, was always meant
to be at the rate of 12%. Therefore, the petitioner is liable to
pay GST on Mango pulp @ 12%.
8. In view of the above, orders passed by the Appellate
Authority for Advance Ruling imposing GST in respect of ‘mango
pulp’ @ 18% is incorrect and it is made clear that the petitioner
is liable to pay GST in respect of Mango pulp @ 12%.
9. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall
be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ
Petition shall stand closed.
JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU
14.09.2022