Check your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 6 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itPunch your phone number in the box below
I’II send an OTP on it.
I won’t confide your phone with anyone.
My Dear ,
Please write your reason against the objection raised in the box below.
I appreciate your effort.
May I request you to select one of the reasons for purging from below.
Disrespectful or rude towards a person or a group.
Promotes an undisclosed link or product or service.
Not seeking genuine answers .
Vulgar, Obscene, abusive etc..
Not a post on law or business.
Copied from other website or source and pasted here.
Has bad format, grammar, spelling so requires moderatation.
Thank you,
Yours sincerely,
Aaradhika, Thakurani's bestie
Do you think that the tax news in simple language are better? Can you write them in simple language? and then broadcast? Then Write them at shocks n mocks.
In a significant ruling, the Gauhati High Court addressed the cancellation of GST registrations for multiple petitioners, emphasizing the need for proper notice and opportunity to be heard before such actions are taken. The court quashed the cancell…
Login to write your newsGarg Agency challenged the validity of certain GST notifications and related orders, arguing they were issued without proper procedure. The Delhi High Court, noting that the Supreme Court is already considering the same issue, set aside the ex-parte…
Login to write your newsThis case involves several traders accused of fraudulently availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) by generating fake invoices without actual supply of goods. The petitioners challenged the tax a…
Login to write your newsThis case involves M/s JVG Technology Private Limited, an exporter of mobile phones, who sought a GST refund that was initially denied by the tax department but later allowed by the Appellate Authority. Despite this, the department withheld the refu…
Login to write your newsThis case involves Bharat Construction & Tank Cleaner, which challenged GST show cause notices and related notifications, arguing procedural lapses and lack of opportunity to be heard. The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with the tax order, d…
Login to write your newsThis case involves Standard Cartons Pvt Ltd challenging a penalty order for allegedly availing fake Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the GST regime. The Delhi High Court declined to interfere through its writ jurisdiction, citing the seriousness of the …
Login to write your newsIn the case of G.S. Industries vs. Commissioner of Central Tax and GST Delhi West, the petitioner challenged the rejection of part of their interest claim on a GST refund. The court ultimately decided to grant some interest but not the full amount s…
Login to write your newsIn the case of Raj Kumar Aggarwal (through legal heir Sandeep Aggarwal) vs. Union of India, the High Court of Delhi addressed a petition challenging a Show Cause Notice and a demand order related to GST. The court decided to remand the case for a pe…
Login to write your newsIn the case of Oak Holidays & Resorts India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors., the petitioner sought relief from tax demands due to financial difficulties exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing a…
Login to write your newsThis case involves three writ petitions filed by industrial units in Assam seeking tax exemptions under the Industrial Policy of Assam 2008 and the Assam Industries (Tax Exemption) Scheme, 2009. The court addressed whether the state government could…
Login to write your newsThis case involves Mahabir Tiwari challenging a government notification that extended the time limit for issuing GST orders for the financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20. The court found that the extension was made without the required recommendation …
Login to write your newsThis case involves M/S. Metal Handicrafts (the petitioner) versus the State of U.P. and 5 others. The company faced issues with incorrect details in their GST registration after migrating from VAT. Despite multiple attempts to rectify the error, the…
Login to write your newsThis case involves M/s Lucent Iron and Steel Traders, a steel trading company that made a costly mistake in their October 2018 GST return. Due to their consultant’s error, they accidentally filed another company’s data in their GSTR-3B return, leading to wrongful Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims worth over ₹5 crores. When the GST department issued a recovery notice with penalties, the company approached the High Court directly instead of following the…
This case involves M/s. Vinod Agarwal, a work contractor, who challenged the dismissal of his GST appeal by tax authorities. The appeal was rejected because he didn’t submit a certified copy of the original order within 7 days as required by rules. However, the High Court of Chhattisgarh ruled in his favor, finding that a 2022 amendment to the GST rules (which had retrospective effect) made such certified copies unnecessary when orders are uploaded…
This case involves Mayasheel Retail India Limited challenging a GST demand order and recovery notice issued by the Chhattisgarh tax authorities. The company approached the High Court directly through a writ petition, claiming they weren’t given proper notice or hearing before the demand was issued. However, the court refused to hear the case, saying the company should have first used the statutory appeal process available under GST law before comin…
This case involves three businessmen - Shripal Kawadiya, Kushal Kawadiya (brothers), and Bharat Khedkar - who were accused of financial fraud by a complainant named Atul Mohan Bhandari. The complainant alleged that these individuals, along with his employees, conspired to cheat him of money through false accounting entries and fraudulent transactions. The accused applied for anticipatory bail (pre-arrest bail) at the Bombay High Court’s Aurangabad …
This case involves M/s. Sri Gopi Krishna Rice Mill challenging a GST assessment order issued by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax. The main issue was that the order did not have the assessing officer’s signature or a Document Identification Number (DIN). The Andhra Pradesh High Court set aside the order, holding that both the signature and DIN are essential for the order’s validity.
Sandhya Constructions challenged a GST assessment order that was not signed by the assessing officer. The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled in favor of the company, setting aside the unsigned order and allowing the tax authorities to issue a fresh, properly signed order after giving notice to the company.
Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025This case involves M/s. Sierra Software Systems and Solutions challenging GST assessment orders issued by the tax authorities in Andhra Pradesh. The main issue was that the orders were unsigned and lacked a Document Identification Number (DIN). The High Court found these procedural lapses made the orders invalid and set them aside, allowing the authorities to issue fresh, properly signed orders with DINs if they wish.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed a GST assessment order against Vemula Veera Swamy because the order was not signed by the assessing officer. The court held that such an unsigned order is invalid, following previous decisions on the same issue. The authorities were given liberty to issue a fresh, properly signed order after due notice.
This case involves M/s Usman Enterprises challenging a GST assessment order issued without the signature of the assessing officer. The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the unsigned order and emphasizing that such orders are invalid under the law. The court also allowed the tax authorities to issue a fresh, properly signed order after giving the petitioner a fair hearing.
This case involves M/s. Arikatia Venkateswarlu, a business from Ongole, challenging a GST penalty order issued by the tax authorities for the 2020-21 period. The main issue was that the assessment order was uploaded on the GST portal without the digital or electronic signature of the assessing officer. The Andhra Pradesh High Court set aside the penalty order, holding that such orders must be properly signed to be valid under the law.
Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025Check your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 6 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itCheck your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 6 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itCheck your phone. I have messaged an OTP. It is a 5 digit number. Feed it in the box below
Do you want me to resend the OTP? Yes resend itThanks, for confirming your phone number.
You can change it in your profile.Are you a tax professional?
If yes, then you can earn
money through me.
download the mobile app
You have successfully created your diary. You can access it from 'Store/Your Stuff' section.
OK