Shocksnmocks image
News Topics
Thakurani
A9 Top Floor C Block Community Center, Naraina Vihar
New Delhi, Delhi 110028
Facebook
Twitter
Google+

View and comment on the tax updates on a single page

Do you think that the tax news in simple language are better? Can you write them in simple language? and then broadcast? Then Write them at shocks n mocks.

Shocksnmocks image
  • Court rejects GST writ petition over filing error must use statutory appeal rou…

    Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025

    This case involves M/s Lucent Iron and Steel Traders, a steel trading company that made a costly mistake in their October 2018 GST return. Due to their consultant’s error, they accidentally filed another company’s data in their GSTR-3B return, leading to wrongful Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims worth over ₹5 crores. When the GST department issued a recovery notice with penalties, the company approached the High Court directly instead of following the…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Court allows GST appeal dismissed on technicality after rule amendment clarifie…

    Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025

    This case involves M/s. Vinod Agarwal, a work contractor, who challenged the dismissal of his GST appeal by tax authorities. The appeal was rejected because he didn’t submit a certified copy of the original order within 7 days as required by rules. However, the High Court of Chhattisgarh ruled in his favor, finding that a 2022 amendment to the GST rules (which had retrospective effect) made such certified copies unnecessary when orders are uploaded…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Court dismisses GST writ petition - company must use statutory appeal route fir…

    Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025

    This case involves Mayasheel Retail India Limited challenging a GST demand order and recovery notice issued by the Chhattisgarh tax authorities. The company approached the High Court directly through a writ petition, claiming they weren’t given proper notice or hearing before the demand was issued. However, the court refused to hear the case, saying the company should have first used the statutory appeal process available under GST law before comin…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025

    This case involves three businessmen - Shripal Kawadiya, Kushal Kawadiya (brothers), and Bharat Khedkar - who were accused of financial fraud by a complainant named Atul Mohan Bhandari. The complainant alleged that these individuals, along with his employees, conspired to cheat him of money through false accounting entries and fraudulent transactions. The accused applied for anticipatory bail (pre-arrest bail) at the Bombay High Court’s Aurangabad …

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025

    This case involves M/s. Sri Gopi Krishna Rice Mill challenging a GST assessment order issued by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax. The main issue was that the order did not have the assessing officer’s signature or a Document Identification Number (DIN). The Andhra Pradesh High Court set aside the order, holding that both the signature and DIN are essential for the order’s validity.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments

Unsigned GST Assessment Order Set Aside by Andhra Pradesh High Court

Sandhya Constructions challenged a GST assessment order that was not signed by the assessing officer. The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled in favor of the company, setting aside the unsigned order and allowing the tax authorities to issue a fresh, properly signed order after giving notice to the company.

Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025
0 Upvote|   0 Comments
  • Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025

    This case involves M/s. Sierra Software Systems and Solutions challenging GST assessment orders issued by the tax authorities in Andhra Pradesh. The main issue was that the orders were unsigned and lacked a Document Identification Number (DIN). The High Court found these procedural lapses made the orders invalid and set them aside, allowing the authorities to issue fresh, properly signed orders with DINs if they wish.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025

    The Andhra Pradesh High Court quashed a GST assessment order against Vemula Veera Swamy because the order was not signed by the assessing officer. The court held that such an unsigned order is invalid, following previous decisions on the same issue. The authorities were given liberty to issue a fresh, properly signed order after due notice.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025

This case involves M/s Usman Enterprises challenging a GST assessment order issued without the signature of the assessing officer. The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the unsigned order and emphasizing that such orders are invalid under the law. The court also allowed the tax authorities to issue a fresh, properly signed order after giving the petitioner a fair hearing.

0 Upvote   | 0 Comments

GST Penalty Order Set Aside for Missing Officer’s Signature, High Court Rules

This case involves M/s. Arikatia Venkateswarlu, a business from Ongole, challenging a GST penalty order issued by the tax authorities for the 2020-21 period. The main issue was that the assessment order was uploaded on the GST portal without the digital or electronic signature of the assessing officer. The Andhra Pradesh High Court set aside the penalty order, holding that such orders must be properly signed to be valid under the law.

Goods & Services Tax,Jul. 07, 2025
0 Upvote|   0 Comments
Loading...
Ask a Question Create a Ripple(News)