Shocksnmocks image
News Topics
Thakurani
A9 Top Floor C Block Community Center, Naraina Vihar
New Delhi, Delhi 110028
Facebook
Twitter
Google+

View and comment on the tax updates on a single page

Do you think that the tax news in simple language are better? Can you write them in simple language? and then broadcast? Then Write them at shocks n mocks.

Shocksnmocks image
  • Court Denies Budgetary Support Claims by Zydus Wellness and Alkem Laboratories …

    Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Jun. 05, 2025

    In the case of Zydus Wellness Products Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors. and Alkem Laboratories Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors., the High Court of Sikkim ruled against both companies seeking budgetary support under a government scheme. The court found that changes in ownership and structure disqualified them from the benefits intended for “eligible units.”

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • High Court of Sikkim Dismisses Defamation Quashing Petition by Mathrubhumi Prin…

    Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Jun. 05, 2025

    In the case of Crl.M.C. No.06 of 2021, the High Court of Sikkim addressed a defamation complaint against the Mathrubhumi Printing and Publishing Company Limited and others, filed by Santiago Martin. The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash the lower court’s order, allowing the defamation proceedings to continue.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Court Allows Temporary Injunction to Proceed Without Foreign Respondents

    Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Jun. 05, 2025

    This case involves M/s Unire Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (the petitioner) challenging a lower court order that required them to serve notice to two foreign respondents (from Canada) through the Embassy before proceeding with a temporary injunction. The High Court decided that since the temporary injunction only concerned the Indian respondents (Respondents 3 to 6), the case could move forward against them without waiting for service to the foreign…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Jun. 05, 2025

    This case involves M/s World Trade Park Ltd. challenging a GST-related order, but the main issue is that the GST Appellate Tribunal—where such appeals should go—is not yet functional. The High Court, following its own earlier decisions, has allowed the petitioner to delay filing an appeal until the Tribunal is set up, provided certain payments are made. The court also protected the petitioner from recovery proceedings in the meantime.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Jun. 05, 2025

    This case involves Sandeep Kumar, a café manager accused of stealing and misappropriating around ₹44 lakhs from his employer, Muhavra Enterprises Private Limited (Blue Tokai Coffee Roasters). The company alleged that Sandeep manipulated cash deposits over several months. Sandeep sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, fearing arrest. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted him anticipa…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments

Court clarifies transfer vs. return of cases under ESI Rules; orders trial to r…

This case involves M/s Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. and the Employees State Insurance Corporation. The main dispute was about whether a case, after significant progress in one court, should be “returned” or “transferred” to another court under Rule 18 of the Punjab Employees Insurance Court Rules, 1951. The High Court held that once a case has advanced beyond the initial stage, it must be transferred (not returned), and the new court can conti…

Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Jun. 05, 2025
0 Upvote|   0 Comments
  • Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Jun. 05, 2025

    This case involves M/s Graphic Trades Private Limited, which challenged the blocking of its Input Tax Credit (ITC) worth over ₹1.18 crore by Bihar tax authorities. The ITC was blocked after it was found that one of its suppliers, M/s TDML Services Private Limited, was non-existent at its registered address. The court did not quash the blocking order but told the petitioner to use the remedy available under tax guidelines to seek unblocking, leaving…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Jun. 05, 2025

    This case involves a dispute between the State Health Society, Bihar, and M/s Suraksha Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd. over the encashment of a bank guarantee submitted as earnest money for a government tender. The main issue was whether the State Health Society was justified in encashing the bank guarantee before the expiry of its term, and whether the amount should be refunded with interest. The court ultimately ordered the refund of the encashed amount to…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Jun. 05, 2025

This case involves a dispute over a bounced cheque between M/s Shiv Pharmaceuticals (the accused/petitioner) and M/s Raptakos Brett & Company Ltd. (the complainant/opposite party). The accused wanted the cheque and related documents to be examined by a handwriting expert to challenge the complainant’s case, but the trial court refused. The Orissa High Court upheld the trial court’s decision, but clarified that the accused can still present expert e…

0 Upvote   | 0 Comments

Hospital Allowed to Continue BSKY Scheme Pending Fire Safety Certificate

Moon Hospitals Pvt. Ltd. approached the Orissa High Court because it was at risk of losing its empanelment under the BSKY health scheme due to delays in getting a regularized building plan and a renewed Fire Safety Certificate. The court ordered that the hospital should be allowed to continue under the BSKY scheme until the Fire Safety Certificate is issued, provided all fire safety defects are addressed.

Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Jun. 05, 2025
0 Upvote|   0 Comments
Loading...
Ask a Question Create a Ripple(News)