Shocksnmocks image
News Topics
Thakurani
A9 Top Floor C Block Community Center, Naraina Vihar
New Delhi, Delhi 110028
Facebook
Twitter
Google+

View and comment on the tax updates on a single page

Do you think that the tax news in simple language are better? Can you write them in simple language? and then broadcast? Then Write them at shocks n mocks.

Shocksnmocks image
  • Some apparent discrepancies, contradictions in the goods description in the inv…

    Customs & Excise,Feb. 24, 2024

    The legal order pertains to Excise Appeal No. 20375 of 2020 filed by M/s. Encop Wires Private Limited against the Commissioner of Central Tax, Belagavi. The appeal was made against the demand for duty, interest, and penalty due to alleged clandestine removal of goods without payment of duty. After a thorough analysis, the Hon’ble Dr. D.M. Misra, Member (Judicial), allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • The Department must bring direct, tangible, corroborative, and strict evidence …

    Customs & Excise,Feb. 24, 2024

    The demands cannot be confirmed solely on the basis of notebooks maintained by workers and that the Department must produce clinching evidence in the nature of purchase of inputs and sale of the final product to confirm demands.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Tribunal Sets Aside Penalty Imposed on Appellant in Customs Appeal Case

    Customs & Excise,Feb. 24, 2024

    The provides details of a legal case involving Customs Appeal No. 862 of 2011 and Customs Appeal No. 1746 of 2010, heard at the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Bangalore. The case revolves around the interception of a passenger concealing a large amount of foreign currency, leading to the confiscation of the currency and the imposition of a penalty. The appellant filed an appeal, and after considering the arguments from both side…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Customs & Excise,Feb. 24, 2024

    The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench in Ahmedabad ruled in a legal case involving Excise Appeal No. 10341 of 2015-DB. The case centered around the seizure of Pouch Packing Machines and the manufacturing of Pan Masala Containing Tobacco without the payment of Central Excise duty. The appellant, Pareshbhai Ramanbhai Amin, contested the duty demand confirmed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara, and the Tri…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Customs & Excise,Feb. 24, 2024

    The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, Eastern Zonal Bench, in the case of Excise Appeal No. 75370 of 2021, ruled in favor of the Appellant, M/s Raj Kumar Gupta (Alias) Shri Raj Kumar Sultania alias Shri Raju Sultania, setting aside the demand of Central Excise Duty, interest, and penalty imposed on them by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Patna.

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments

Assessee successfully proved Department's Shallow investigation and saved itsel…

The case involved an excise appeal filed by M/s Ludhiana Steel Rolling Mills against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana. The department accused the appellant of violating the Central Excise Act by trading in steel scrap without paying for the applicable Central Excise duty. After a thorough review, the tribunal ruled in favor of M/s Ludhiana Steel Rolling Mills, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.

Customs & Excise,Feb. 24, 2024
0 Upvote|   0 Comments
  • Customs & Excise,Feb. 24, 2024

    The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) West Zonal Bench at Ahmedabad heard Excise Appeal No. 12790 of 2014, which involved the alleged clandestine removal of goods by Crown Ceramics. The case revolved around the recovery of duty amounting to Rs. 39,43,754/- based on documents impounded during a visit by preventive officers. After a detailed investigation and multiple appeals, the CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, settin…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Customs & Excise,Feb. 24, 2024

    The departmental officers conducted a search at the factory premises of M/s. Sharda Rerollers Private Limited and found documents showing clearance of goods without payment of duty. They recorded the statements from employees and the Managing Director, revealing contradictory information. Despite contesting the show-cause notice, the Commissioner (Appeals) passed an adjudication order, confirming the demand and imposing penalties for clandestine cl…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
Customs & Excise,Jan. 04, 2024

The pertains to Excise Appeal No. 86876 of 2013 and Excise Appeal No. 86877 of 2013, involving Crompton Greaves Ltd, Transformer Division, Kanjur, Mumbai 400042, and the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai – III. It discusses the appellant’s manufacturing of transformers, clearance for domestic and export purposes, availing of duties of central excise, re-export of transformers after repairs, and the restoration of credit sought by the appellant…

0 Upvote   | 0 Comments

M/s. BMW India Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI and others: Dispute over Service Tax on Expatr…

The case involves a dispute between M/s. BMW India Pvt. Ltd. and the Union of India (UOI) regarding the payment of service tax on the amount of salaries and perquisites relating to expatriates under Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service. The petitioner contests a notice issued under Section 73(1) of the Central Goods Service Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) for payment of IGST along with applicable interest.

Customs & Excise,Jan. 04, 2024
0 Upvote|   0 Comments
Loading...
Ask a Question Create a Ripple(News)