Shocksnmocks image
News Topics
Thakurani
A9 Top Floor C Block Community Center, Naraina Vihar
New Delhi, Delhi 110028
Facebook
Twitter
Google+

View and comment on the tax updates on a single page

Do you think that the tax news in simple language are better? Can you write them in simple language? and then broadcast? Then Write them at shocks n mocks.

Shocksnmocks image
  • No books of accounts are to be maintained, ITAT orders deletion of income add b…

    Income Tax,Sep. 16, 2021

    The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed an appeal challenging additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) to the appellant's income. The appellant, a kirana merchant, was not required to maintain any books of account as per Section 44AA read with Section 44AF of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The AO made additions solely relying on a statement recorded during a survey under Section 133A. The ITAT directed the AO to delete the additions mad…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Only the profit from bogus purchases, not the entire amount, should be taxed if…

    Income Tax,Oct. 07, 2020

    The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the treatment of bogus purchases made by the assessee. The Revenue contended that the entire amount covered by such purchases should have been added to the total income of the assessee, while the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to make a further addition of 3% of the bogus purchases and estimate the income accordingly. The High Cou…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • BGR Energy Systems embroiled in bogus purchases case, court upholds tax departm…

    Income Tax,Jul. 06, 2021

    This case revolves around BGR Energy Systems Ltd. (BGRESL), a company engaged in manufacturing capital goods and executing EPC contracts. During a search operation, the Income Tax Department found evidence suggesting that BGRESL had obtained bogus purchase bills from certain vendors to inflate expenses. The company’s founder, Late B.G. Raghupathy, was also implicated in the case. The court upheld the tax department’s additions towards these alleged…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Income Tax,Sep. 02, 2021

    The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, allowed the appeal filed by Firepro Wireless & Technologies Pvt. Ltd. against the order of the CIT(A)-31, New Delhi relating to assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal held that no addition on account of bogus purchases and disallowance u/s 14A was justified.

    0 Upvote   | 1 Comments
  • Income Tax,May. 11, 2021

    The case involves appeals filed by an assessee, a trader of ferrous and non-ferrous metals, against the CIT(A)’s order confirming the AO’s ad-hoc disallowance of 12.5% of trading purchases from alleged hawala parties. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)’s order and directed the AO to restrict additions to the extent of bringing the GP rate on disputed purchases at the same rate as other genuine purchases, following the Bombay High Court’s decision in Moh…

    0 Upvote   | 1 Comments

MCA Imposes ₹3.65 Lakh Penalty on Director for Violating DIN Regulations

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has imposed a penalty of ₹3.65 lakh on a director, Mr. Sandeep Kumar, for non-compliance with the Director Identification Number (DIN) regulations. This action, documented under Order No: ROC/ADJ/326/223465/2023 dated February 22, 2024, highlights the importance of adherence to the legal requirements under the Companies Act, 2013. The case involves M/S. Octacle Integration Private Limited, a company registere…

Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Apr. 02, 2024
0 Upvote|   0 Comments
  • Goods & Services Tax,Apr. 11, 2024

    The case involves the National Internet Exchange of India (petitioner) challenging the rejection of its claim for refund of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) in respect of zero-rated supplies. The rejection was based on the ground that the petitioner’s application was filed beyond the period stipulated under Section 54(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner argued that its subsequent applications were filed online…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
  • Co. Law, Sebi, Audit & A/c,Mar. 12, 2024

    In a stern move to uphold corporate governance standards, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has imposed a substantial penalty of Rs. 3.41 lakh on a director for violating the Director Identification Number (DIN) regulations. The case involves Subhangini Industries Private Limited, where a director, Mr. Sandeep Kumar, was appointed without a valid DIN, contravening Section 152(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The penalty highlights the importanc…

    0 Upvote   | 0 Comments
Goods & Services Tax,Apr. 09, 2024

The court set aside the order cancelling the petitioner's GST registration with retrospective effect from 03.12.2021. The petitioner, a garment manufacturer, had applied for a change in registered business address, but the application was rejected due to non-submission of documents. Subsequently, the petitioner's GST registration was cancelled retrospectively for allegedly issuing invoices without supply of goods or services. The court found the ca…

0 Upvote   | 0 Comments

GST refund formula in Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules is absolutely legal, Supreme Cou…

This case revolves around the validity of Rule 89(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, which prescribes a formula for calculating the refund of unutilized input tax credit (ITC) on input services. The Supreme Court upheld the validity of this rule, overruling the Gujarat High Court's decision that had struck down the rule as ultra vires (beyond the scope) of Section 54(3) of the CGST Act.

Goods & Services Tax,May. 19, 2022
0 Upvote|   1 Comments
Loading...
Ask a Question Create a Ripple(News)